Literature DB >> 10894863

Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: A trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group.

U Vanhoefer1, P Rougier, H Wilke, M P Ducreux, A J Lacave, E Van Cutsem, M Planker, J G Santos, P Piedbois, B Paillot, H Bodenstein, H J Schmoll, H Bleiberg, B Nordlinger, M L Couvreur, B Baron, J A Wils.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of etoposide, leucovorin, and bolus fluorouracil (ELF) or infusional fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FUP) with that of the reference protocol of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (FAMTX) in advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 399 patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach were randomized and analyzed for toxicity, tumor response, and progression-free and overall survival. Only reviewed and confirmed responses were considered. The analysis of remission was based on assessable patients with documented measurable lesions. The intent-to-treat principle, log-rank test, and Cox regression model were used for the statistical analysis of time-to-event end points.
RESULTS: The overall response rate for 245 eligible patients with measurable disease was 9% with ELF, 20% with FUP, and 12% with FAMTX, with no significant differences. One hundred twelve patients were eligible for efficacy in assessable, nonmeasurable disease. No change was observed in 66% of patients treated with ELF, 56% with FUP, and 55% with FAMTX. Two patients achieved a complete tumor regression (one each for ELF and FAMTX). With a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, the median survival times were 7.2 months with ELF, 7.2 months with FUP, and 6.7 months with FAMTX, respectively, with no significant differences. Nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities of ELF, FUP, and FAMTX were acceptable, with neutropenia being the major toxicity for all three regimens. Seven treatment-related deaths occurred (two with FUP and five with FAMTX).
CONCLUSION: All three investigated regimens demonstrate modest clinical efficacy and should not be regarded as standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer. New strategies should be considered to achieve a better clinical efficacy in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10894863     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.14.2648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  142 in total

1.  Three-week combination chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective study with 159 patients.

Authors:  Dong Hoe Koo; Min-Hee Ryu; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Sung-Sook Lee; Jung-Hwa Moon; Heung-Moon Chang; Jae-Lyun Lee; Tae Won Kim; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Efficacy of RAD001 (everolimus) against advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination.

Authors:  Fumiko Taguchi; Yasuo Kodera; Yasufumi Katanasaka; Kazuyoshi Yanagihara; Tomohide Tamura; Fumiaki Koizumi
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Biomarker analysis in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy: orotate phosphoribosyltransferase expression is associated with treatment outcomes.

Authors:  In Sil Choi; Hye Seung Lee; Keun-Wook Lee; Haeryoung Kim; Ki Hwan Kim; Yu Jung Kim; Jee Hyun Kim; Woo Ho Kim; Jong Seok Lee
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Alternating treatment with S-1 plus low-dose cisplatin and S-1 alone for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhito Mita; Hideto Ito; Masato Fukumoto; Ryo Murabayashi; Kazuya Koizumi; Takashi Hayashi; Hiroyuki Kikuchi; Tadashi Kagaya
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  The role of chemotherapy in the current treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Daniel Haller; Atsushi Ohtsu
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Newly emerging standard chemotherapies for gastric cancer and clinical potential in elderly patients.

Authors:  Shinichi Sakuramoto; Keishi Yamashita; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2009-10-15

Review 7.  Treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Michele Orditura; Gennaro Galizia; Vincenzo Sforza; Valentina Gambardella; Alessio Fabozzi; Maria Maddalena Laterza; Francesca Andreozzi; Jole Ventriglia; Beatrice Savastano; Andrea Mabilia; Eva Lieto; Fortunato Ciardiello; Ferdinando De Vita
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and oral etoposide in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: association with severe myelotoxicity.

Authors:  Gil Bar-Sela; Medy Tsalic; Diana Gaitini; Mariana Steiner; Nissim Haim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Outcomes in elderly patients treated with a single-agent or combination regimen as first-line chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer.

Authors:  Der Sheng Sun; Eun Kyoung Jeon; Hye Sung Won; Ji Chan Park; Byoung Young Shim; Suk Young Park; Young Seon Hong; Hoon Kyo Kim; Yoon Ho Ko
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Efficacy of S-1 plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Honma; Yasuhiro Shimada; Atsuo Takashima; Satoru Iwasa; Ken Kato; Tetsuya Hamaguchi; Yasuhide Yamada; Hirokazu Taniguchi; Shigeki Sekine; Ryoji Kushima
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.