Literature DB >> 10893506

Implications of different fiber measures for epidemiologic studies of man-made vitreous fibers.

M M Quinn1, T J Smith, E A Eisen, D H Wegman, M J Ellenbecker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several researchers have proposed fiber size ranges representing hypotheses about the biological activity of fibers. Each of these indices has a biologically plausible rationale, yet they propose different fiber dimensions.
METHODS: Four biologically based and one standard fiber analytic method index, the NIOSH 7400 method with B rules, were evaluated in air monitoring data collected in a variety of fiber glass (FG) manufacturing settings to determine their impact on an assessment of fiber exposure for an epidemiologic study of the risk of respiratory cancer among FG production workers.
RESULTS: All indices varied considerably within and among the range of fiber size distributions sampled in the FG factories.
CONCLUSIONS: The asymptotic relative efficiencies (R(2)) calculated among the five indices indicate a potentially important loss of power from the use of the standard method index, if one of the biologically based indices is more closely related to the disease outcome in an epidemiologic study. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10893506     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0274(200008)38:2<132::aid-ajim3>3.0.co;2-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  5 in total

1.  Size- and type-specific exposure assessment of an asbestos products factory in China.

Authors:  Midori N Courtice; D Wayne Berman; Eiji Yano; Norihiko Kohyama; Xiaorong Wang
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 2.  Dosimetry of inhaled elongate mineral particles in the respiratory tract: The impact of shape factor.

Authors:  Bahman Asgharian; T Price Owen; Eileen D Kuempel; Annie M Jarabek
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 3.  Evaluating the mechanistic evidence and key data gaps in assessing the potential carcinogenicity of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in humans.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Marie-Claude Jaurand; Peter Møller; Yasuo Morimoto; Norihiro Kobayashi; Kent E Pinkerton; Linda M Sargent; Roel C H Vermeulen; Bice Fubini; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.635

4.  Airborne fiber size characterization in exposure estimation: Evaluation of a modified transmission electron microcopy protocol for asbestos and potential use for carbon nanotubes and nanofibers.

Authors:  John M Dement; Eileen D Kuempel; Ralph D Zumwalde; Anna M Ristich; Joseph E Fernback; Randall J Smith
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Asbestos fibre dimensions and lung cancer mortality among workers exposed to chrysotile.

Authors:  Dana Loomis; John Dement; David Richardson; Susanne Wolf
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 4.402

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.