Literature DB >> 10893124

Are medical students comfortable with practicing physical examinations on each other?

E H Chang1, D V Power.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess medical student attitudes toward, and comfort with, taking turns practicing peer physical examinations (PPEs) on fellow classmates.
METHOD: A questionnaire with 25 Likert-scaled questions was administered to 164 end-first-year medical students at the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Topics assessed included: (1) comfort with various aspects of PPEs; (2) attitudes regarding the professionalism, appropriateness, and perceived value of PPEs; (3) attitudes toward peer breast, genital, and rectal exams; and (4) the effects of age and gender on response.
RESULTS: Of the 164 students surveyed, 124 (76%) responded. Almost all (98%) agreed that PPEs are appropriate, valuable, and a comfortable experience. Fewer students were comfortable with performing inguinal examinations and conducting PPEs with students of the opposite gender. Twelve percent of the students expressed difficulty in setting limits with peers, and 48% felt exposed when undressed as an examination model in front of a group of peers. The majority of students were opposed to peer breast, genital, and rectal examinations. Some statistically significant gender differences and age/gender interactions were observed.
CONCLUSION: Results suggest that this sample of medical students was very comfortable with PPEs and willing to participate in PPEs, although a few students were uncomfortable with these examinations. No extensive curricular change appears warranted, though steps can be taken to maximize overall student comfort and to accommodate the few students who do not favor PPEs.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10893124     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200004000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  Perception of peer physical examination in two Australian osteopathy programs.

Authors:  Brett Vaughan; Sandra Grace
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2016-07-11

2.  A Mokken scale analysis of the peer physical examination questionnaire.

Authors:  Brett Vaughan; Sandra Grace
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2018-03-01

3.  New context, new content-Rethinking genital anatomy in textbooks.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hayes; Meredith J Temple-Smith
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 6.652

4.  Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Fabrizio Consorti; Rosaria Mancuso; Annalisa Piccolo; Giacomo Consorti; Joseph Zurlo
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Volunteer patients and small groups contribute to abdominal examination's success.

Authors:  Helen M Shields; Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker; Sarah N Flier; Byron P Vaughn; Melissa H Tukey; Stephen R Pelletier; Douglas A Horst
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2017-11-01

6.  Willingness of medical students to be examined in a physical examination course.

Authors:  Manuel Burggraf; Julia Kristin; Alexander Wegner; Sascha Beck; Stephanie Herbstreit; Marcel Dudda; Marcus Jäger; Max Daniel Kauther
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.