Literature DB >> 10892909

Who should follow up lung cancer patients after operation?

S Gilbert1, K R Reid, M Y Lam, D Petsikas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether follow-up by a thoracic surgeon after lung cancer resection alters survival.
METHODS: The charts of 245 early stage (< or = IIB) non-small cell lung cancer patients, diagnosed between 1988 and 1995, were reviewed. Follow-up data were complete to January 1, 1997, in 96.3% (236 of 245) of cases.
RESULTS: Ninety of the 111 recurrences were detected before discharge from the thoracic clinic. Despite clinic follow-up, 66.7% (60 of 90) were identified by the family physician, and only 28.9% (26 of 90) by the surgeon. The remaining 4.4% (4 of 90) were detected by other physicians. Ninety-six percent (25 of 26) surgeon-detected recurrences had suspicious clinical or chest radiographic findings, compared with 92% for family physician-detected recurrences (55 of 60; not significant). The cost per recurrence detected by surgeons was Can $4,367. A 75% cost savings could ensure if patients were followed up by their family physician. There was no 5-year survival benefit for patients whose recurrence was detected by the surgeon.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up after limited-stage non-small cell lung cancer resection could possibly be performed by a family physician alone without compromising overall survival, and with significant cost savings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10892909     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01145-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  Detecting lung cancer relapse using self-evaluation forms weekly filled at home: the sentinel follow-up.

Authors:  Fabrice Denis; Louise Viger; Alexandre Charron; Eric Voog; Christophe Letellier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Detection of lung cancer relapse using self-reported symptoms transmitted via an internet web-application: pilot study of the sentinel follow-up.

Authors:  Fabrice Denis; Louise Viger; Alexandre Charron; Eric Voog; Olivier Dupuis; Yoann Pointreau; Christophe Letellier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-01-12       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in thoracic surgery, do they end at discharge?

Authors:  Maria Rodriguez; Maria Aymerich
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 4.  Surveillance of resected non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  A López-González; P Ibeas Millán; B Cantos; M Provencio
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Negative effect of cyclin D1 overexpression on recurrence-free survival in stage II-IIIA lung adenocarcinoma and its expression modulation by vorinostat in vitro.

Authors:  Eunju Lee; DongHao Jin; Bo Bin Lee; Yujin Kim; Joungho Han; Young Mog Shim; Duk-Hwan Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Healthcare utilisation in general practice and hospitals in the year preceding a diagnosis of cancer recurrence or second primary cancer: a population-based register study.

Authors:  Linda Aagaard Rasmussen; Henry Jensen; Line Flytkjær Virgilsen; Alina Zalounina Falborg; Henrik Møller; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Integrated care for resected early stage lung cancer: innovations and exploring patient needs.

Authors:  Jan Ho; Annette McWilliams; Jon Emery; Christobel Saunders; Christopher Reid; Suzanne Robinson; Fraser Brims
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2017-06-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.