OBJECTIVES: To examine the ability of a very brief (6-item) self-report screener, the Oregon Adolescent Depression Project Conduct Disorder Screener (OADP-CDS), to identify adolescents with a lifetime diagnosis of conduct disorder and to examine its ability to predict antisocial personality disorder by age 24. Relevant scales from the Yough Self-Report and the Child Behavior Checklist were examined for comparison purposes. METHOD: A total of 1,709 high school students completed an initial questionnaire and diagnostic interview assessment (T1); 1,507 participants returned approximately 1 year later for a second assessment (T2). A third (T3) assessment was conducted with selected T2 participants (n = 940) after they had turned 24 years of age. RESULTS: The OADP-CDS had good internal consistency, test-retest stability, and screening properties. Differences in the screening ability of the OADP-CDS as a function of gender and social desirability were nonsignificant. The efficacy of the measure as a screener did not differ significantly from that of longer adolescent- and parent-report measures. Perhaps most importantly, the OADP-CDS was able to identify future cases of antisocial personality disorder in young adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that self-report screening for conduct disorder with older adolescents is possible and should be explored further.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the ability of a very brief (6-item) self-report screener, the Oregon Adolescent Depression Project Conduct Disorder Screener (OADP-CDS), to identify adolescents with a lifetime diagnosis of conduct disorder and to examine its ability to predict antisocial personality disorder by age 24. Relevant scales from the Yough Self-Report and the Child Behavior Checklist were examined for comparison purposes. METHOD: A total of 1,709 high school students completed an initial questionnaire and diagnostic interview assessment (T1); 1,507 participants returned approximately 1 year later for a second assessment (T2). A third (T3) assessment was conducted with selected T2 participants (n = 940) after they had turned 24 years of age. RESULTS: The OADP-CDS had good internal consistency, test-retest stability, and screening properties. Differences in the screening ability of the OADP-CDS as a function of gender and social desirability were nonsignificant. The efficacy of the measure as a screener did not differ significantly from that of longer adolescent- and parent-report measures. Perhaps most importantly, the OADP-CDS was able to identify future cases of antisocial personality disorder in young adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that self-report screening for conduct disorder with older adolescents is possible and should be explored further.
Authors: Inga Dora Sigfusdottir; Bryndis Bjork Asgeirsdottir; Hildigunnur Anna Hall; Jon Fridrik Sigurdsson; Susan Young; Gisli H Gudjonsson Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Jason J Washburn; Erin Gregory Romero; Leah J Welty; Karen M Abram; Linda A Teplin; Gary M McClelland; Leah D Paskar Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2007-04
Authors: Pedro Pechorro; Matt DeLisi; Rui Abrunhosa Gonçalves; João Pedro Oliveira Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alfgeir L Kristjansson; Annette M Santilli; Rosalina Mills; Hannah M Layman; Megan L Smith; Michael J Mann; James MacKillop; Jack E James; Christa L Lilly; Steven M Kogan Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2022-08-05
Authors: Gisli H Gudjonsson; Jon Fridrik Sigurdsson; Inga Dora Sigfusdottir; Bryndis Bjork Asgeirsdottir; Rafael A González; Susan Young Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2015-11-04 Impact factor: 4.328