| Literature DB >> 10890826 |
Abstract
Several publications in the psychological literature support the theory that children are a major source of stress for their parents. Not surprisingly, parents of children with behavior problems--particularly children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)--experience highly elevated levels of daily child-rearing stresses. Children with ADHD disregard parental requests, commands, and rules; fight with siblings; disturb neighbors; and have frequent negative encounters with schoolteachers and principals. Although may investigations have dealt with parenting stress caused by disruptive children, only a handful of studies have addressed the question of how parents cope with this stress. Those findings are presented, including a series of studies assessing parental distress and alcohol consumption among parents of normal children and ADHD children after the parents interacted with either normal- or deviant-behaving children. Those studies strongly support the assumption that the deviant child behaviors that represent major chronic interpersonal stressors for parents of ADHD children are associated with increased parental alcohol consumption. Studies also have demonstrated that parenting hassles may result in increased alcohol consumption in parents of "normal" children. Given these findings, the stress associated with parenting and its influence on parental alcohol consumption should occupy a salient position among the variables that are examined in the study of stress and alcohol problems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1999 PMID: 10890826 PMCID: PMC6760385
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Alcohol Res Health ISSN: 1535-7414
Figure 1A model of the relationships among parental stress, child behavior problems, and parental drinking.
Figure 2To measure the effects of children’s behavior on stress and alcohol use, parents of normal children interacted with boys who were trained to enact behaviors characteristic of either normal children or “deviant” children. Under these controlled experimental conditions, results showed that when exposed to deviant-behaving children, both mothers and fathers of normal children experienced considerable distress and consumed higher levels of alcohol compared with parents who interacted with normal-behaving children. (A) shows parents’ subjective self-reports of their interactions with deviant- or normal-behaving children. Higher bars reflect higher levels of distress, as interpreted by parents using the MAACL and single-item descriptors of the quality of the interaction. (B) shows the amount of pure alcohol (in milliliters per kilograms of bodyweight [mL/kg]) consumed by parents after interacting with either normal- or deviant-behaving children. Parents consumed more alcohol after interacting with deviant-behaving children. (C) shows parents’ total scores using the CBRS to describe their interactions with normal- and deviant-behaving children. Parents perceived much higher levels of misbe-havior in the deviant-behaving children.
NOTE: Deviant children are defined as those who have behavioral problems, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder. Normal children are defined as those children who do not meet the criteria for diagnosable psychopathology.
MAACL = Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist. This checklist was used to ascertain the parents’ mood states. The list includes specific descriptors, such as anxiety, depression, and hostility, to describe the parent’s interactions with the children.
CBRS = Child Behavior Rating Scale. Parents used this scale to describe children’s misbehavior (range = 0–140).
Single-adjective measures = measures of each parent’s interpretation of the degree of pleasantness in interacting with the child [with 0 being very pleasant and 6 being unpleasant]; the parent’s success in getting the child to complete his tasks [with 0 being very successful and 6 being very unsuccessful]; and the parent’s view of his or her effectiveness in parenting that particular child [with 0 being very effective and 6 being very ineffective]).
SOURCE: Pelham et al. 1997.