OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Examine and compare in detail the time courses of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I amplitude and latency to the distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitude and phase measured in the rabbit model following deliberate obstruction of cochlear blood flow (CBF). METHODS: Using a posterior fossa craniotomy in five rabbits, the internal auditory artery (IAA) was compressed with a probe. ABR and otoacoustic emission were continuously monitored before, during, and after the compressions. RESULTS: ABR wave I amplitudes demonstrated measurable decreases at a mean of 28.3 s after IAA compression, whereas DPOAE amplitudes decreased after a mean of 14.8 s. Wave I latencies began to increase at a mean of 18.3 s after occlusion, while DPOAE phase measures changed after a mean of only 4.8 s following IAA compression. The time-course patterns were similar for the amplitudes of both ABR wave I and DPOAE. CONCLUSIONS: ABR wave I amplitude follows a similar, though delayed (by approximately 10 s) time-course pattern to that of the DPOAE following IAA compression. The implication of these findings for intraoperative auditory monitoring is that changes in many currently employed measures will lag actual surgically induced alterations in CBF by at least 20 to 30 s.
OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Examine and compare in detail the time courses of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) wave I amplitude and latency to the distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitude and phase measured in the rabbit model following deliberate obstruction of cochlear blood flow (CBF). METHODS: Using a posterior fossa craniotomy in five rabbits, the internal auditory artery (IAA) was compressed with a probe. ABR and otoacoustic emission were continuously monitored before, during, and after the compressions. RESULTS: ABR wave I amplitudes demonstrated measurable decreases at a mean of 28.3 s after IAA compression, whereas DPOAE amplitudes decreased after a mean of 14.8 s. Wave I latencies began to increase at a mean of 18.3 s after occlusion, while DPOAE phase measures changed after a mean of only 4.8 s following IAA compression. The time-course patterns were similar for the amplitudes of both ABR wave I and DPOAE. CONCLUSIONS: ABR wave I amplitude follows a similar, though delayed (by approximately 10 s) time-course pattern to that of the DPOAE following IAA compression. The implication of these findings for intraoperative auditory monitoring is that changes in many currently employed measures will lag actual surgically induced alterations in CBF by at least 20 to 30 s.
Authors: Stéphane F Maison; Mina Le; Erik Larsen; Suh-Kyung Lee; John J Rosowski; Steven A Thomas; M Charles Liberman Journal: J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Date: 2010-05-26
Authors: Erdem Yavuz; Krzysztof Morawski; Fred F Telischi; Ozcan Ozdamar; Rafael E Delgado; Fabrice Manns; Jean-Marie Parel Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2005-04-25 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Krzysztof Morawski; Fred F Telischi; Faisal Merchant; Lidet W Abiy; Grazyna Lisowska; Grzegorz Namyslowski Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Krzysztof Morawski; Fred F Telischi; Faisal Merchant; Grzegorz Namyslowski; Grazyna Lisowska; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 2.311