Literature DB >> 10890146

Diagnosis and management strategies in congenital atresia of the external auditory canal. Study Group on Otological Malformations and Hearing Impairment.

F Declau1, C Cremers, P Van de Heyning.   

Abstract

This consensus report represents a distillation of current opinion regarding diagnosis and management of congenital aural atresia. It also takes into account the philosophical differences which exist in Europe. Congenital aural atresia requires prompt diagnosis, genetic counselling and an early assessment of hearing. In bilateral atresia, early amplification with a bone conduction hearing aid is essential for proper speech development. Further rehabilitation in bilateral cases is managed with surgical reconstruction in selected patients or by implantation of a bone-anchored hearing aid. Atresia repair surgery is worthwhile if proper patient selection is made by use of stringent audiological and radiological criteria and state of the art surgery is performed. The divergent views concerning indications, ideal age for surgery and surgical approach to achieve better hearing are discussed. Review of the literature demonstrated that even in the hands of the best surgeons a mean hearing gain of only 20-25 dB is achieved in atresia Type II, with 30-35 dB in Type I. Therefore, surgical reconstruction should only be done in the more favourable cases where post-operative hearing of <25-30 dB is attainable. Less favoured patients should be helped with bone-anchored hearing aids, as this type of surgery does not interfere with the future use of new techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10890146     DOI: 10.3109/03005369909090115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  13 in total

1.  [Functional and aesthetic rehabilitation of microtia in children and adolescents].

Authors:  J M Hempel; T Braun; A Berghaus
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Improved directional hearing of children with congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss implanted with an active bone-conduction implant or an active middle ear implant.

Authors:  K Vogt; H Frenzel; S A Ausili; D Hollfelder; B Wollenberg; A F M Snik; M J H Agterberg
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-26       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Bone conduction hearing in congenital aural atresia.

Authors:  Lichun Zhang; Na Gao; Yanbo Yin; Lin Yang; Youzhou Xie; Ying Chen; Peidong Dai; Tianyu Zhang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Search for a genetic cause in children with unilateral isolated microtia and congenital aural atresia.

Authors:  J Mortier; J van den Ende; F Declau; H Vercruysse; W Wuyts; G Van Camp; O Vanderveken; An Boudewyns
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Canalization and maintaining the patency of external auditory canal in a congenital aural atresia patient: a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Guruprasada Upadhyaya
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-10-26

6.  Bone anchored hearing aid: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2002-09-01

Review 7.  Developmental disorders of the ear in children and adolescents: conservative and surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Thomas Braun; John Martin Hempel; Alexander Berghaus
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.594

8.  Reconstruction of middle ear malformations.

Authors:  Konrad Schwager
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

9.  Original Solution for Middle Ear Implant and Anesthetic/Surgical Management in a Child with Severe Craniofacial Dysmorphism.

Authors:  Giovanni Bianchin; Lorenzo Tribi; Aronne Reverzani; Patrizia Formigoni; Valeria Polizzi
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-29

10.  Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid vs. Reconstruction of the External Auditory Canal in Children and Adolescents with Congenital Aural Atresia: A Comparison Study of Outcomes.

Authors:  Soroush Farnoosh; F Tania Mitsinikos; Dennis Maceri; Debra M Don
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.418

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.