Literature DB >> 10889881

Outcome from poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage--which poor grade subarachnoid haemorrhage patients benefit from aneurysm clipping?

P J Hutchinson1, D M Power, P Tripathi, P J Kirkpatrick.   

Abstract

Patients with poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) are associated with high mortality and morbidity, and hence are often treated conservatively. This study has set out to determine the outcome for all poor grade subarachnoid haemorrhage patients, and attempts to identify a subgroup with a more favourable prognosis. During a prospective audit of patients with aneurysmal SAH, patients of poor grade [World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) IV (and not obeying commands) and V] were sedated, paralysed and ventilated for transfer to the Regional Neurosurgical Unit. Any intraventricular blood and/or hydrocephalus was treated by external ventricular drainage. Following a 24-h period for active blood gas, fluid and electrolyte resuscitation, patients were assessed after reversal of sedation. Selection for angiography and potential aneurysm surgery was restricted to those who showed a purposeful response to painful stimulation. Patients who could readily obey commands were not considered 'true' poor grade and were excluded from analysis. In 102 patients with 'true' poor grade SAH admitted between 1991 and 1997, the overall management outcome at 6 months was poor (favourable outcome 25%, mortality 67%). Following reversal of sedation, 55 patients demonstrated a purposeful response and proceeded to angiography, of whom 37 underwent clipping and three coiling of aneurysm. The outcome in this aneurysm treated subgroup was favourable in 53% (mortality 28%). If patients over the age of 65 years are excluded, the management outcome was favourable in 35% (mortality 58%), with those patients proceeding to clipping or coiling of aneurysms having a favourable outcome in 57% (mortality 27%). Patients over the age of 65 years with poor grade SAH had a favourable outcome in only 6% (mortality 85%). The mortality for poor grade SAH patients remains high. However, following resuscitation and correction of any acute hydrocephalus, a patient subgroup identified on simple clinical criteria can be identified who can expect a better outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10889881     DOI: 10.1080/02688690050004516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  25 in total

1.  Subarachnoid haemorrhage and intracranial aneurysms: what neurologists need to know.

Authors:  P J Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Endovascular treatment of PICA aneurysms.

Authors:  W Mukonoweshuro; R D Laitt; D G Hughes
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Long-term domain-specific improvement following poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  J Mocco; Evan R Ransom; Ricardo J Komotar; Paulina B Sergot; Noeleen Ostapkovich; J Michael Schmidt; Kurt T Kreiter; Stephan A Mayer; E Sander Connolly
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Comparative evaluation of H&H and WFNS grading scales with modified H&H (sans systemic disease): A study on 1000 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ashish Aggarwal; Sivashanmugam Dhandapani; Kokkula Praneeth; Harsimrat Bir Singh Sodhi; Sudhir Singh Pal; Sachin Gaudihalli; N Khandelwal; Kanchan K Mukherjee; M K Tewari; Sunil Kumar Gupta; S N Mathuriya
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Outcome in poor grade subarachnoid hemorrhage patients treated with acute endovascular coiling of aneurysms and aggressive intensive care.

Authors:  Christopher J Taylor; Fergus Robertson; David Brealey; Frankie O'shea; Tina Stephen; Stefan Brew; Joan P Grieve; Martin Smith; Ian Appleby
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  External ventricular drainage response in poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: effect on preoperative grading and prognosis.

Authors:  Evan R Ransom; J Mocco; Ricardo J Komotar; Deshdeepak Sahni; Jennifer Chang; David K Hahn; Grace H Kim; J Michael Schmidt; Robert R Sciacca; Stephan A Mayer; E Sander Connolly
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Acute endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms in poor-grade patients.

Authors:  M Bergui; G B Bradac
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Ultra-early microsurgical treatment within 24 h of SAH improves prognosis of poor-grade aneurysm combined with intracerebral hematoma.

Authors:  Junhui Chen; Jun Zhu; Jianqing He; Yuhai Wang; Lei Chen; Chunlei Zhang; Jingxu Zhou; Likun Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Treatment of poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage trial.

Authors:  D Mitra; B Gregson; V Jayakrishnan; A Gholkar; A Vincent; P White; P Mitchell
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients with Hunt and Hess grade 4 or 5: treatment using the Guglielmi detachable coil system.

Authors:  Raymond U Weir; Mary L Marcellus; Huy M Do; Gary K Steinberg; Michael P Marks
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.