OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to describe the clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural features of the corneal dystrophy associated with the R124L mutation of the BIGH3 gene. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical and histologic review of a new genetic mutation. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four patients from five unrelated French families with corneal dystrophy caused by the R124L mutation of the BIGH3 gene were studied at the clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural levels. Records of patients carrying this mutation were compared with those from three unrelated patients with corneal dystrophy of Bowman's layer (CDB) type 2 (R555Q mutation) and from three unrelated patients with classic corneal granular dystrophy (R555W mutation). INTERVENTION: The mutational genetic status of the BIGH3 gene was determined for each patient, and the histologic and ultrastructural data available after corneal graft were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes. Exons 4 and 12 of the BIGH3 gene were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and the PCR products were directly sequenced. RESULTS: All 34 patients with the R124L mutation displayed the clinical, histologic, and electron microscopic features of the dystrophy previously described as a superficial variant of corneal granular dystrophy. Combining molecular genetics with clinical and histologic findings established a clear distinction between the R555Q and R555W dystrophies. CONCLUSIONS: The R124L mutation of the BIGH3 gene is associated with specific clinical and morphologic criteria. This indicates that molecular studies are needed for an adequate classification of corneal dystrophies. All criteria are presently available to segregate the dystrophy caused by the R124L mutation (known as CDB1) from the dystrophy caused by the R555Q mutation (known as CDB2).
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to describe the clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural features of the corneal dystrophy associated with the R124L mutation of the BIGH3 gene. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical and histologic review of a new genetic mutation. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-four patients from five unrelated French families with corneal dystrophy caused by the R124L mutation of the BIGH3 gene were studied at the clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural levels. Records of patients carrying this mutation were compared with those from three unrelated patients with corneal dystrophy of Bowman's layer (CDB) type 2 (R555Q mutation) and from three unrelated patients with classic corneal granular dystrophy (R555W mutation). INTERVENTION: The mutational genetic status of the BIGH3 gene was determined for each patient, and the histologic and ultrastructural data available after corneal graft were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes. Exons 4 and 12 of the BIGH3 gene were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and the PCR products were directly sequenced. RESULTS: All 34 patients with the R124L mutation displayed the clinical, histologic, and electron microscopic features of the dystrophy previously described as a superficial variant of corneal granular dystrophy. Combining molecular genetics with clinical and histologic findings established a clear distinction between the R555Q and R555Wdystrophies. CONCLUSIONS: The R124L mutation of the BIGH3 gene is associated with specific clinical and morphologic criteria. This indicates that molecular studies are needed for an adequate classification of corneal dystrophies. All criteria are presently available to segregate the dystrophy caused by the R124L mutation (known as CDB1) from the dystrophy caused by the R555Q mutation (known as CDB2).
Authors: Kyong Jin Cho; Jee Won Mok; Kyung Sun Na; Chang Rae Rho; Yong Soo Byun; Ho Sik Hwang; Kyu Yeon Hwang; Choun-Ki Joo Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Benjamin R Lin; Derek J Le; Yabin Chen; Qiwei Wang; D Doug Chung; Ricardo F Frausto; Christopher Croasdale; Richard W Yee; Fielding J Hejtmancik; Anthony J Aldave Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Catherine E Wheeldon; Betina H de Karolyi; Dipika V Patel; Trevor Sherwin; Charles N J McGhee; Andrea L Vincent Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2008-08-18 Impact factor: 2.367