Literature DB >> 10888958

Endoscopic approaches to metastatic thoracic disease.

R F McLain1, I H Lieberman.   

Abstract

Traditional approaches to thoracic metastases and spinal cord compression have been well worked out and validated in the literature. Anterior decompression is clearly superior to laminectomy; vertebrectomy and reconstruction are indicated for sagittal collapse, instability, and pain; and surgical decompression is necessary in cases of bony impingement. The role of endoscopic and minimally invasive techniques in treatment of metastatic disease is evolving. Dr. Lieberman advocates the use of thoracoscopic anterior approaches as the principal application in these patients, whereas Dr. McLain has found that endoscopic assistance has vastly improved his results with posterolateral decompression. The two authors weigh the relative advantages and disadvantages of these approaches for the selected patient with metastatic thoracic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10888958     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200007150-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  1 in total

1.  Endoscopic medial parascapular approach to the thoracic spine.

Authors:  H Elsaghir
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.