Literature DB >> 10887321

First aid anaphylaxis management in children who were prescribed an epinephrine autoinjector device (EpiPen).

M S Gold1, R Sainsbury.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine for first aid use by parents and other caregivers and in the form of an autoinjector device (EpiPen, Center Laboratories) is often prescribed for children who have had previous anaphylactic reactions. It is not known whether the EpiPen device is used appropriately during subsequent reactions and whether its use is able to prevent the complications of anaphylaxis.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine parental knowledge and practice concerning first aid anaphylaxis management, the frequency of recurrent generalized allergic reactions, the first aid measures taken, and the subsequent outcome of these reactions.
METHODS: A retrospective survey was performed with a telephone questionnaire of all children with a history of anaphylaxis who attended a specialist allergy service and were prescribed an EpiPen autoinjector device.
RESULTS: Recurrent generalized allergic reactions occurred with a frequency of 0.98 episodes per patient per year and were more common in those with food compared with insect venom anaphylaxis. The EpiPen device was only used in 29% of recurrent anaphylactic reactions. Parental knowledge was deficient in recognition of the symptoms of anaphylaxis and use of the EpiPen device, and adequate first aid measures were not in place for the majority of children attending school. Those children in whom the EpiPen device was used were less likely to be given epinephrine in hospital and to require subsequent hospital admission.
CONCLUSION: The EpiPen autoinjector device is infrequently used in children with recurrent episodes of anaphylaxis; the reasons for this require further research. It is likely that parents and other caregivers will require continuing education and support in first aid anaphylaxis management. When the EpiPen device is used appropriately, it appears to reduce subsequent morbidity from anaphylaxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10887321     DOI: 10.1067/mai.2000.106041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  33 in total

Review 1.  Update on food allergy in adults.

Authors:  Rabia Quddus Chaudhry; John J Oppenheimer
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 2.  Adrenaline in the treatment of anaphylaxis: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Andrew P C McLean-Tooke; Claire A Bethune; Ann C Fay; Gavin P Spickett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-06

Review 3.  Making clinical decisions when the stakes are high and the evidence unclear.

Authors:  Wendy Hu; Andrew Kemp; Ian Kerridge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-09

4.  Pediatric anaphylaxis management in the prehospital setting.

Authors:  Gunjan Kamdar Tiyyagura; Linda Arnold; David C Cone; Melissa Langhan
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 5.  Are the dangers of childhood food allergy exaggerated?

Authors:  Allan Colver
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-02

6.  The effect of income on anaphylaxis preparation and management plans in Toronto primary schools.

Authors:  David W Frost; Catherine G Chalin
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

7.  Anaphylaxis in a New York City pediatric emergency department: triggers, treatments, and outcomes.

Authors:  Faith Huang; Kanwaljit Chawla; Kirsi M Järvinen; Anna Nowak-Węgrzyn
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 10.793

8.  Treatment of anaphylaxis: EpiPen, Twinject, or another autoinjector?

Authors:  Alexandre Ackaoui
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  How far from correct is the use of adrenaline auto-injectors? A survey in Italian patients.

Authors:  Erminia Ridolo; Marcello Montagni; Laura Bonzano; Eleonora Savi; Silvia Peveri; Maria Teresa Costantino; Mariangiola Crivellaro; Giuseppina Manzotti; Carlo Lombardi; Marco Caminati; Cristoforo Incorvaia; Gianenrico Senna
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.397

10.  Epinephrine treatment is infrequent and biphasic reactions are rare in food-induced reactions during oral food challenges in children.

Authors:  Kirsi M Järvinen; Sujitha Amalanayagam; Wayne G Shreffler; Sally Noone; Scott H Sicherer; Hugh A Sampson; Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 10.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.