Literature DB >> 10886505

Protection by ultraviolet A and B sunscreens against in situ dipyrimidine photolesions in human epidermis is comparable to protection against sunburn.

A R Young1, J M Sheehan, C A Chadwick, C S Potten.   

Abstract

Sunscreens prevent sunburn and may also prevent skin cancer by protecting from ultraviolet-induced DNA damage. We assessed the ability of two sunscreens, with different spectral profiles, to inhibit DNA photodamage in human epidermis in situ. One formulation contained the established ultraviolet B filter octyl methoxycinnamate, whereas the other contained terephthalylidene dicamphor sulfonic acid, a new ultraviolet A filter. Both formulations had sun protection factors of 4 when assessed with solar simulating radiation in volunteers of skin type I/II. We tested the hypothesis that sun protection factors would indicate the level of protection against DNA photodamage. Thus, we exposed sunscreen-treated sites to four times the minimal erythema dose of solar simulating radiation, whereas vehicle and control sites were exposed to one minimal erythema dose. We used monoclonal antibodies against thymine dimers and 6-4 photoproducts and image analysis to quantify DNA damage in skin sections. A dose of four times the minimal erythema dose, with either sunscreen, resulted in comparable levels of thymine dimers and 6-4 photoproducts to one minimal erythema dose +/- vehicle, providing evidence that the DNA protection factor is comparable to the sun protection factor. The lack of difference between the sunscreens indicates similar action spectra for erythema and DNA photodamage and that erythema is a clinical surrogate for DNA photodamage that may lead to skin cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10886505     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2000.00012.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Dermatol        ISSN: 0022-202X            Impact factor:   8.551


  6 in total

1.  [Primary and secondary prevention of skin cancer in organ transplant recipients].

Authors:  A S Lonsdorf; M R Becker; E Stockfleth; K Schäkel; C Ulrich
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Modulating effects of oral administration of Lycii Fructus extracts on UVB-induced skin erythema: A Randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Makoto Tsunenaga; Wensi Xu; Takumi Myojin; Toshiyuki Nakamura; Tatsuya Kon; Yoshimasa Nakamura; Osamu Ueda
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Sulforaphane mobilizes cellular defenses that protect skin against damage by UV radiation.

Authors:  Paul Talalay; Jed W Fahey; Zachary R Healy; Scott L Wehage; Andrea L Benedict; Christine Min; Albena T Dinkova-Kostova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  [Functional food and bioavailability in the target organ skin].

Authors:  M Darwin; S Schanzer; A Teichmann; U Blume-Peytavi; W Sterry; J Lademann
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Azathioprine and UVA light generate mutagenic oxidative DNA damage.

Authors:  Peter O'Donovan; Conal M Perrett; Xiaohong Zhang; Beatriz Montaner; Yao-Zhong Xu; Catherine A Harwood; Jane M McGregor; Susan L Walker; Fumio Hanaoka; Peter Karran
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Skin Hyperpigmentation in Indian Population: Insights and Best Practice.

Authors:  Stephanie Nouveau; Divya Agrawal; Malavika Kohli; Francoise Bernerd; Namita Misra; Chitra Shivanand Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.