Literature DB >> 10886116

The incidence of adverse events and risk factors for upper gastrointestinal disorders associated with meloxicam use amongst 19,087 patients in general practice in England: cohort study.

R M Martin1, P Biswas, R D Mann.   

Abstract

AIMS: Meloxicam is a novel nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) which may be associated with fewer adverse upper gastrointestinal events than other NSAIDs because it preferentially inhibits the inducible enzyme cyclo-oxygenase-2 relative to the constitutive isoform, cyclo-oxygenase-1. The aims of the study were to: determine the rate of adverse events associated with meloxicam in general practice, stratify these rates by selected risk factors, and to identify signals of previously unsuspected adverse events associated with meloxicam.
METHODS: As part of the national prescription-event monitoring pharmacovigilance system for newly launched drugs in general practice, all patients prescribed meloxicam in England between December 1996 and March 1997 were identified by the central Prescription Pricing Authority. We sent short questionnaires to all prescribers asking about adverse events experienced within 6 months of the first prescription.
RESULTS: There were 19 087 patients in the study. The rate of dyspepsia during the first month of exposure was 28.3 per 1000 patient-months. There were 33 reports of upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage during treatment (rate: 0.4 per 1000 months). A history of gastrointestinal disorder in the previous year was associated with an increased rate of dyspepsia (rate ratio: 3.0; 95% confidence interval: 2.6, 3.4), abdominal pain (2.1; 1.6, 2.6), and peptic ulcer (4.0; 1.4, 13.2). Prior NSAID use was associated with a 20-30% decrease in the rate of dyspepsia and abdominal pain in patients starting meloxicam, while patients prescribed concomitant gastroprotective agents had a two to three-fold increased rate of dyspepsia, abdominal pain and peptic ulceration. Other rare events were thrombocytopenia (n = 2); interstitial nephritis (n = 1) and idiosyncratic liver abnormalities (n = 1).
CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of gastro-intestinal risk factors the incidence of gastro-intestinal disturbance was low. Such risk factors should be carefully reviewed prior to prescribing meloxicam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10886116      PMCID: PMC2014964          DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00229.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  18 in total

1.  Visual field defect associated with vigabatrin: observational cohort study.

Authors:  L V Wilton; M D Stephens; R D Mann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-30

2.  THE DESIGN AND LOGIC OF A MONITOR OF DRUG USE.

Authors:  D J FINNEY
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1965-01

Review 3.  What lessons can be learnt from withdrawal of mibefradil from the market?

Authors:  A L Po; W Y Zhang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-06-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  150 years of pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  P Routledge
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-04-18       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  COX-2 inhibitors.

Authors:  C J Hawkey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-01-23       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The case for recording events in clinical trials.

Authors:  D C Skegg; R Doll
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-12-10

7.  Market penetration of new drugs in one United Kingdom region: implications for general practitioners and administrators.

Authors:  H McGavock; C H Webb; G D Johnston; E Milligan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-30

8.  Omeprazole compared with misoprostol for ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Omeprazole versus Misoprostol for NSAID-induced Ulcer Management (OMNIUM) Study Group.

Authors:  C J Hawkey; J A Karrasch; L Szczepañski; D G Walker; A Barkun; A J Swannell; N D Yeomans
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-03-12       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Effects of inhibition of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 in chronic gastro-intestinal ulcer models in rats.

Authors:  A Schmassmann; B M Peskar; C Stettler; P Netzer; T Stroff; B Flogerzi; F Halter
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Gastrointestinal tolerability of meloxicam compared to diclofenac in osteoarthritis patients. International MELISSA Study Group. Meloxicam Large-scale International Study Safety Assessment.

Authors:  C Hawkey; A Kahan; K Steinbrück; C Alegre; E Baumelou; B Bégaud; J Dequeker; H Isomäki; G Littlejohn; J Mau; S Papazoglou
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1998-09
View more
  10 in total

1.  Age- and gender-specific asthma death rates in patients taking long-acting beta2-agonists: prescription event monitoring pharmacosurveillance studies.

Authors:  R M Martin; S Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Gut-liver axis improves with meloxicam treatment after cirrhotic liver resection.

Authors:  Astrit R Hamza; Avdyl S Krasniqi; Pramod Kadaba Srinivasan; Mamdouh Afify; Christian Bleilevens; Uwe Klinge; René H Tolba
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Channelling bias and the incidence of gastrointestinal haemorrhage in users of meloxicam, coxibs, and older, non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  T M MacDonald; S V Morant; J L Goldstein; T A Burke; D Pettitt
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Safety profile of celecoxib as used in general practice in England: results of a prescription-event monitoring study.

Authors:  Deborah Layton; Lynda V Wilton; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 5.  Do some inhibitors of COX-2 increase the risk of thromboembolic events?: Linking pharmacology with pharmacoepidemiology.

Authors:  David W J Clark; Deborah Layton; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Evaluation of risk profiles for gastrointestinal and cardiovascular adverse effects in nonselective NSAID and COX-2 inhibitor users: a cohort study using pharmacy dispensing data in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Deborah Layton; Patrick C Souverein; Eibert R Heerdink; Saad A W Shakir; Antoine C G Egberts
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  A pharmacokinetic comparison of meloxicam and ketoprofen following oral administration to healthy dogs.

Authors:  L Montoya; L Ambros; V Kreil; R Bonafine; G Albarellos; R Hallu; A Soraci
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.459

8.  A secure distributed logistic regression protocol for the detection of rare adverse drug events.

Authors:  Khaled El Emam; Saeed Samet; Luk Arbuckle; Robyn Tamblyn; Craig Earle; Murat Kantarcioglu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Meloxicam transdermal delivery: effect of eutectic point on the rate and extent of skin permeation.

Authors:  Soliman Mohammadi-Samani; Gholamhossein Yousefi; Farhad Mohammadi; Fatemeh Ahmadi
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.699

Review 10.  Information about ADRs explored by pharmacovigilance approaches: a qualitative review of studies on antibiotics, SSRIs and NSAIDs.

Authors:  Lise Aagaard; Ebba Holme Hansen
Journal:  BMC Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-03-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.