Literature DB >> 10885433

Safety of sputum induction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

P H Rytilä1, A E Lindqvist, L A Laitinen.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety of sputum induction in patients with varying severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The subjects were 28 smokers with baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of (mean and range) 1.8 (0.8-2.9) L that is 53 (28-69)% of the predicted and reversibility of 2.5 (-7.4-9.9)%. Sputum was induced after premedication with 200 microg salbutamol at increasing concentrations (0.9, 3, 4, and 5%) of hypertonic saline nebulized by an ultrasonic nebulizer. The procedure was well tolerated, and none of the patients reported major side-effects. However, the mean change from prebronchodilator FEV1 during induction was -8.5 (-23-11)%, p=0.001, and from postbronchodilator FEV1 -10.7 (-25-5)%, p<0.0001. Three (11%) of the patients had a fall in FEV1 from the prebronchodilator baseline of >20%, and a further 10 (36%) had a fall of 10-20%. Patients with greater reversibility in airway obstruction seemed to get the best benefit from the bronchodilator pretreatment, since there was an inverse relationship between reversibility in FEV1 and fall in FEV1 during induction (r=-0.4, p=0.03). It is concluded that sputum induction by hypertonic saline inhalation can cause meaningful bronchoconstriction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, despite pretreatment with an inhaled beta2-agonist. The results highlight the importance of monitoring spirometry during sputum induction to detect bronchoconstriction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10885433     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.01522.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  7 in total

1.  Association between markers of emphysema and more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  P Boschetto; S Quintavalle; E Zeni; S Leprotti; A Potena; L Ballerin; A Papi; G Palladini; M Luisetti; L Annovazzi; P Iadarola; E De Rosa; L M Fabbri; C E Mapp
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Dyspnea assessment and adverse events during sputum induction in COPD.

Authors:  Demosthenes Makris; Nikolaos Tzanakis; Joanna Moschandreas; Nikolaos M Siafakas
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 3.317

3.  Value of serum and induced sputum surfactant protein-D in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Berna Akinci Ozyurek; Sevinc Sarinc Ulasli; Serife Savas Bozbas; Nilufer Bayraktar; Sule Akcay
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2013-06-01

4.  Matrix metalloproteinases -8, -9 and -12 in smokers and patients with stage 0 COPD.

Authors:  Helen Ilumets; Paula Rytilä; Ingel Demedts; Guy G Brusselle; Anssi Sovijärvi; Marjukka Myllärniemi; Timo Sorsa; Vuokko L Kinnula
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2007

Review 5.  Airway biomarkers of the oxidant burden in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Noora Louhelainen; Marjukka Myllärniemi; Irfan Rahman; Vuokko L Kinnula
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2008

6.  Sputum analysis in diagnosis and management of obstructive airway diseases.

Authors:  Paige Lacy; Jennifer L Lee; Dilini Vethanayagam
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Is nebulized saline a placebo in COPD?

Authors:  Shahina Y Khan; B Ronan O'Driscoll
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 3.317

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.