Literature DB >> 10885421

Effect of lung volume on the oesophageal diaphragm EMG assessed by magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation.

Y M Luo1, R A Lyall, M L Harris, P Hawkins, N Hart, M I Polkey, J Moxham.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown conflicting results on the effect of lung volume on the diaphragm compound muscle action potential (CMAP). Consequently, the ability to quantify the oesophageal diaphragm electromyography (EMG) has been questioned. If lung volume changes have little effect on the diaphragm CMAP the accurate measurement of voluntary EMG, as an index of respiratory drive, may be possible. Furthermore, the measurement of CMAP could provide useful clinical information when evaluating patients with neuromuscular disease. To reassess the effect of lung volume on the oesophageal diaphragm CMAP, six normal subjects were studied using an oesophageal catheter incorporating seven electrodes (number one being proximal and seven distal) that were 1 cm in length and 1 cm apart. Electrode number three was positioned at the centre of the electrically active region of the diaphragm (EARdi) at functional residual capacity (FRC). The diaphragm CMAP elicited by bilateral magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerves was simultaneously recorded from four electrode pairs. Pair one was created from electrodes one and three, pair two from electrodes two and four, pair three from electrodes three and five, and pair four from electrodes five and seven. Phrenic nerve stimulation was at residual volume (RV), FRC, FRC+1.0 L, FRC+2.0 L, and total lung capacity (TLC). The CMAP recorded from pair one was least influenced by changes in lung volume and the amplitude was 2.41+/-0.39 (mean+/-SD), 2.60+/-0.27, 2.64+/-0.29, and 2.71+/-0.45 mV at RV, FRC, FRC+1.0 L and FRC+2.0 L, respectively. At TLC the CMAP was more variable. The CMAP amplitude recorded from pair two increased with increasing lung volume and at FRC+2.0 L was 3.7 times larger than that at FRC. Pair four usually recorded substantially smaller CMAPs at all lung volumes. This study shows that the diaphragm compound muscle action potential recorded from an oesophageal electrode just above the diaphragm is relatively stable over the lung volume range residual volume to functional residual capacity+2.0 L.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10885421     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.01510.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  4 in total

1.  Measurement of diaphragm loading during pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  Brigitte Fauroux; Nicholas Hart; Yuan M Luo; Stephanie MacNeill; John Moxham; Frédéric Lofaso; Michael I Polkey
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-10-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Dyspnea in COPD: New Mechanistic Insights and Management Implications.

Authors:  Denis E O'Donnell; Kathryn M Milne; Matthew D James; Juan Pablo de Torres; J Alberto Neder
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Pressure measurement characteristics of a micro-transducer and balloon catheters.

Authors:  William MacAskill; Ben Hoffman; Michael A Johnson; Graham R Sharpe; Dean E Mills
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-04

4.  Continuous positive airway pressure improves respiratory mechanics and efficiency of neural drive in stable COPD: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Zhen-Yu Liang; Xi-Long Wang; Yun Li; Yi-Rong Lu; Jun-Fang Liu; Jia-Hui Li; Li-Mei Xu; Guo-Qiang Chen; Ping Chang; Zhong-Ran Cen; Xin Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.005

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.