Literature DB >> 10884950

Building bridges between populations and samples in epidemiological studies.

W Kalsbeek1, G Heiss.   

Abstract

The increased use of rigorous population-sampling methods and the analysis of data from those samples in cross-sectional surveys, case-control studies, longitudinal-cohort investigations, and other epidemiological research efforts have raised important statistical issues for health analysts. We describe the origin, implications, and some plausible resolutions for several of these issues. Some of the main issues we consider include (a) establishing whom the sample represents; (b) using sample weights; (c) understanding the role of other important features, such as the use of sampling stratification and the selection of clustered groups of population members; and (d) finding ways to analyze study data with key sampling features in mind. Ultimately, resolution of all of these issues requires that analysts clearly define a reference population and then understand the role of design features in relating sample results to that population.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10884950     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health        ISSN: 0163-7525            Impact factor:   21.981


  14 in total

Review 1.  What is a representative brain? Neuroscience meets population science.

Authors:  Emily B Falk; Luke W Hyde; Colter Mitchell; Jessica Faul; Richard Gonzalez; Mary M Heitzeg; Daniel P Keating; Kenneth M Langa; Meghan E Martz; Julie Maslowsky; Frederick J Morrison; Douglas C Noll; Megan E Patrick; Fabian T Pfeffer; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Moriah E Thomason; Pamela Davis-Kean; Christopher S Monk; John Schulenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Hershey Medical Center Technical Workshop Report: optimizing the design and interpretation of epidemiologic studies for assessing neurodevelopmental effects from in utero chemical exposure.

Authors:  Robert W Amler; Stanley Barone; Aysenil Belger; Cheston M Berlin; Christopher Cox; Harry Frank; Michael Goodman; Jean Harry; Stephen R Hooper; Roger Ladda; Judy S LaKind; Paul H Lipkin; Lewis P Lipsitt; Matthew N Lorber; Gary Myers; Ann M Mason; Larry L Needham; Babasaheb Sonawane; Theodore D Wachs; Janice W Yager
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 4.294

3.  A pseudo-random patient sampling method evaluated.

Authors:  Nicole L De La Mata; Mi-Young Ahn; Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy; Penh Sun Ly; Oon Tek Ng; Kinh Van Nguyen; Tuti Parwati Merati; Thuy Thanh Pham; Man Po Lee; Nicolas Durier; Matthew G Law
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  The epidemiological profile of alcohol and other drug use in metropolitan China.

Authors:  Hui Cheng; Sing Lee; Adley Tsang; Yueqin Huang; Zhaorui Liu; James C Anthony; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Perceived family impact of preschool anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Nissa R Towe-Goodman; Lauren Franz; William Copeland; Adrian Angold; Helen Egger
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 8.829

6.  Stratified sampling design and loss to follow-up in survival models: evaluation of efficiency and bias.

Authors:  Cibele C César; Marilia S Carvalho
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Assessing generalisability through the use of disease registers: findings from a diabetes cohort study.

Authors:  Michael David; Robert Ware; Maria Donald; Rosa Alati
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Methodological issues associated with collecting sensitive information over the telephone--experience from an Australian non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) prevalence study.

Authors:  Anne W Taylor; Graham Martin; Eleonora Dal Grande; Sarah Swannell; Simon Fullerton; Philip Hazell; James E Harrison
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  A proposal for assessing study quality: Biomonitoring, Environmental Epidemiology, and Short-lived Chemicals (BEES-C) instrument.

Authors:  Judy S LaKind; Jon R Sobus; Michael Goodman; Dana Boyd Barr; Peter Fürst; Richard J Albertini; Tye E Arbuckle; Greet Schoeters; Yu-Mei Tan; Justin Teeguarden; Rogelio Tornero-Velez; Clifford P Weisel
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 9.621

10.  Importance of hemodialysis-related outcomes: comparison of ratings by a self-help group, clinicians, and health technology assessment authors with those by a large reference group of patients.

Authors:  Inger M Janssen; Fueloep Scheibler; Ansgar Gerhardus
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.