Literature DB >> 10884671

Isolated bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery: late consequences of incomplete revascularization.

R Scott1, E H Blackstone, P M McCarthy, B W Lytle, F D Loop, J A White, D M Cosgrove.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Multiple strategies to achieve some degree of myocardial revascularization are available. In some, less complete revascularization is accepted to limit invasiveness. To examine the issues of incomplete revascularization, we assessed the long-term impact of additional non-left anterior descending coronary artery stenoses in patients undergoing only grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery.
METHODS: A total of 2067 patients underwent primary isolated grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery from 1971 to 1997. Of these, 26% and 13% had 2- and 3-system disease, respectively. Multivariable analyses of survival and reintervention were performed in the hazard function domain for 27,683 patient-years of follow-up (mean 14 +/- 6.7).
RESULTS: Survival was 99%, 88%, and 62% at 1, 10, and 20 years. Right coronary artery or left circumflex system disease of 50% or more (P =.02) and particularly high-grade (>/=70%) left circumflex (P =.01) and proximal right coronary artery disease (P =.01), as well as any degree of left main trunk stenosis (P <.0001), were associated with reduced long-term survival. Compared with 75% 20-year survival in patients with no non-left anterior descending disease, those with either left circumflex or left main trunk disease experienced a 44% survival, and those with proximal right coronary artery disease, 42%. The most common stated reason for incomplete revascularization was small vessel size. Freedom from reintervention was 89% and 65% at 10 and 20 years, respectively. High-grade left main trunk disease, but, in contrast, mid or distal disease of the right coronary artery, and not left circumflex disease, were risk factors for reintervention.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings call into question the long-term appropriateness of interventions whose strategy includes leaving unrevascularized segments in territories not in the distribution of the left anterior descending coronary artery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10884671     DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2000.107280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  17 in total

Review 1.  Coronary revascularization in the 21st century. Emphasis on contributions by Japanese surgeons.

Authors:  Hendrick B Barner
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2002-12

Review 2.  Surgery is the best intervention for severe coronary artery disease.

Authors:  David P Taggart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-02

Review 3.  Incomplete revascularization: what the surgeon needs to know.

Authors:  Dror B Leviner; Gianluca Torregrossa; John D Puskas
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-07

Review 4.  Complete versus incomplete coronary revascularization: definitions, assessment and outcomes.

Authors:  Prakriti Gaba; Bernard J Gersh; Ziad A Ali; Jeffrey W Moses; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: does every culprit lesion require revascularization?

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; David P Faxon
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Impact of incomplete surgical revascularization on survival.

Authors:  Miguel Guerra; João Carlos Mota
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-28

7.  [Current evidence-based situation in coronary revascularization--CABG vs. PCI and diabetes?].

Authors:  M T R Grapow; R von Wattenwyl; H-R Zerkowski
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  On-pump beating-heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: early outcomes.

Authors:  Bilgehan Erkut; Ozgur Dag; Mehmet Ali Kaygin; Mutlu Senocak; Husnu Kamil Limandal; Umit Arslan; Adem Kiymaz; Ahmet Aydin; Nail Kahraman; Eyup Serhat Calik
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Full-sternotomy off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass procedures: in-hospital outcomes and complications during one year in a single center.

Authors:  Tomaso Bottio; Giulio Rizzoli; Luca Caprili; Georgios Nesseris; Gaetano Thiene; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2003

10.  Evaluation of revascularization subtypes in octogenarians undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Abdulhameed Aziz; Anson M Lee; Michael K Pasque; Jennifer S Lawton; Nader Moazami; Ralph J Damiano; Marc R Moon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.