OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology-sponsored training packet for identification of carotid artery calcifications on panoramic radiographs. STUDY DESIGN: Two examiners, who completed the training (trainees), examined 778 panoramic radiographs. The sample included 298 men, with a mean age of 66, and 480 women, with a mean age of 68. Findings were compared with those obtained by an oral and maxillofacial radiologist. A kappa statistic was used to determine agreement between the 2 trainees. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the program was estimated by comparing the trainees rating of disease status with an expert in case identification. RESULTS: Examiners 1 and 2 identified 99 and 78 positive cases, respectively. A kappa statistic of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81-0.92) was obtained, indicating good interexaminer agreement. The expert identified 27 positive cases, resulting in a PPV of 34.6% (95% CI, 24.4-46.3). CONCLUSION: Although the training packet offers valuable training, it does not provide a high PPV, suggesting the need to modify it or to seek an expert opinion before classification of a patient as having calcification on a panoramic radiograph.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology-sponsored training packet for identification of carotid artery calcifications on panoramic radiographs. STUDY DESIGN: Two examiners, who completed the training (trainees), examined 778 panoramic radiographs. The sample included 298 men, with a mean age of 66, and 480 women, with a mean age of 68. Findings were compared with those obtained by an oral and maxillofacial radiologist. A kappa statistic was used to determine agreement between the 2 trainees. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the program was estimated by comparing the trainees rating of disease status with an expert in case identification. RESULTS: Examiners 1 and 2 identified 99 and 78 positive cases, respectively. A kappa statistic of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81-0.92) was obtained, indicating good interexaminer agreement. The expert identified 27 positive cases, resulting in a PPV of 34.6% (95% CI, 24.4-46.3). CONCLUSION: Although the training packet offers valuable training, it does not provide a high PPV, suggesting the need to modify it or to seek an expert opinion before classification of a patient as having calcification on a panoramic radiograph.
Authors: A H Friedlander; S M El Saden; R C Hazboun; T I Chang; W K Wong; N R Garrett Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Arthur H Friedlander; Lindsay L Graves; Shannon G Grabich; Nona Aghazadehsanai; Tina I Chang Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2017-03-28 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: A H Friedlander; T I Chang; N Aghazadehsanai; G R Berenji; N D Harada; N R Garrett Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Maria Garoff; Jan Ahlqvist; Eva Levring Jäghagen; Elias Johansson; Per Wester Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Hoang-Anh Tran; Jessica B O'Connell; Urie K Lee; John C Polanco; Tina I Chang; Arthur H Friedlander Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2019-03-19 Impact factor: 2.419