Literature DB >> 10884212

Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component.

Y Watanabe1, N Shiba, S Matsuo, F Higuchi, Y Tagawa, A Inoue.   

Abstract

Finite element analysis was performed using 3-dimensional models to examine the biomechanical characteristics of the femoral component in resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Stress concentration was observed in the cortical bone adjacent to the rim of the prosthesis. Stress shielding was observed in the anterosuperior regions on the cancellous bone cross-sections near the cup rim. These biomechanical characteristics may lead to complications such as femoral neck fractures in patients with osteopenic bone and long-term loosening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10884212     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.1359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  15 in total

1.  Is the increase in bone mineral density after hip resurfacing uniform across the femoral neck?

Authors:  Ramprasad Kancherla; Arun Kannan; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Bone mineral density of the proximal femur recovers after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Matteo Cadossi; Antonio Moroni; Matteo Romagnoli; Eugenio Chiarello; Cesare Faldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

3.  Improved mechanical long-term reliability of hip resurfacing prostheses by using silicon nitride.

Authors:  Wen Zhang; M Titze; B Cappi; D C Wirtz; R Telle; H Fischer
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  2011 Marshall Urist Young Investigator Award: when to release patients to high-impact activities after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Katherine M Bedigrew; Erin L Ruh; Qin Zhang; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Hip resurfacing: a technology reborn.

Authors:  Steven Cutts; Paul B Carter
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  2008 Otto Aufranc Award: component design and technique affect cement penetration in hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Wadih Y Matar; Philippe Poitras; Kevin Smit; Olivier May
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Longitudinal evaluation of time related femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Wenbao Wang; Jeffrey A Geller; Rohit Hasija; Jung Keun Choi; David A Patrick; William Macaulay
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-04-18

8.  Curved-stem hip resurfacing: minimum 20-year followup.

Authors:  James W Pritchett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Craig J Della Valle; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Is it Time for Cementless Hip Resurfacing?

Authors:  Julien Girard
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.