Literature DB >> 10884199

The AGC total knee prosthesis at average 11 years.

R H Emerson1, L L Higgins, W C Head.   

Abstract

A retrospective study of a series of 126 consecutive primary cemented total knee replacements using the AGC prosthesis is reported. Sixty-two knees were available for long-term review with an average clinical follow-up of 11.4 years (range, 8.4-13.6 years). The survivorship was 95%, defining the endpoint as revision of all components for any reason except sepsis. The average knee flexion was 110.9 degrees. The average Knee Society score was 91, and the average Knee Society Functional score was 67. There was no finding of tibial polyethylene failure, wear debris-generated osteolysis, or tibial or femoral loosening. Seven metal-backed patellae developed wear-through at an average of 80.4 months (7 of 126 for a 5.5% failure rate), with 3 (2.3%) resulting in complete revision. The authors continue to use the AGC prosthesis with an all-polyethylene patella. Compared with historical controls, the AGC has comparable survivorship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10884199     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.4337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  11 in total

1.  A comparison of the PCL-retaining AGC and posterior stabilizing legacy prostheses for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philip M Faris; Merrill A Ritter; Thomas J Aleto; Andrew L Pierce
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-09

Review 2.  Is there any superiority in the clinical outcome of mobile-bearing knee prosthesis designs compared to fixed-bearing total knee prosthesis designs in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee joint? A review of the literature.

Authors:  H Van der Bracht; G Van Maele; P Verdonk; K F Almqvist; R Verdonk; M Freeman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Validity of published outcome data concerning Anatomic Graduated Component total knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Gerald Dorninger; Mark Agreiter; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A retrospective medium- to long-term results of 1500 AGC total knee replacements - An independent centre functional follow up and survivorship.

Authors:  Amit Atrey; Mark C Edmondson; Debra East; Kim Miles; Adrian Butler-Manuel; Nigel Ellens
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2014-02-04

5.  Men versus women: does size matter in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Roger H Emerson; Jessica Martinez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Is pain and dissatisfaction after TKA related to early-grade preoperative osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Gregory G Polkowski; Erin L Ruh; Toby N Barrack; Ryan M Nunley; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Bart G Pijls; Edward R Valstar; Klaas-Auke Nouta; Josepha Wm Plevier; Marta Fiocco; Saskia Middeldorp; Rob Ghh Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Patellar resurfacing in posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty (PATRES): design of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Maria J F J Bischoff; Tom M van Raaij; Inge H F Reininga; Jos J A M van Raay
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Lennard G H van den Boom; Reinoud W Brouwer; Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Jos J A M van Raaij
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Does knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses? A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Morten G Thomsen; Roshan Latifi; Thomas Kallemose; Henrik Husted; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.