Literature DB >> 10883839

Survival and viability of vitrified in vitro and in vivo produced ovine blastocysts.

M Dattena1, G Ptak, P Loi, P Cappai.   

Abstract

Ovine blastocysts were produced by maturation, fertilization and in vitro culture (IVM/IVF/IVC) of oocytes from slaughtered adult and prepubertal ewes and collection from superovulated and inseminated adult animals. Dulbecco's PBS supplemented with 0.3 mM Na Pyruvate and 20% FCS was used as the basic cryopreservation solution. The embryos were exposed to the vitrification solution as follows: 10% glycerol (G) for 5 min, then 10% G +20% ethylene glycol (EG) for 5 min. Embryos were placed into 25% G + 25% EG in the center of 0.25- mL straws and plunged immediately into LN2. Warming was done by placing the straws into a water bath at 37 degrees C for 20 sec, and their contents were expelled into a 0.5 M sucrose solution for 3 min; the embryos were then transferred into 0.25 M and 0.125 M sucrose solution for 3 min each. Warmed blastocysts were transferred to the culture medium for 24 h. Survival was defined as the re-expansion of the blastocoele. All surviving blastocysts were transferred to synchronized recipient ewes, and the pregnancy was allowed to go to term. Of 68 vitrified in vitro produced blastocysts, 46 re-expanded (67.6%) and 10 lambs were born (14.7%). From the 62 in vivo derived and vitrified embryos, 52 re-expanded (83.8%) and 39 lambs were born (62.9%). The lambing rate of in vitro produced fresh transfer embryos was 40% (20 lambs/50 blastocysts transferred), and of the 32 in vivo derived blastocysts and transferred fresh, 26 lambs were born (81.2%). The results indicate that in vitro produced embryos can be successfully cryopreserved by vitrification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10883839     DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(00)00293-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

1.  Plasma membrane and acrosome loss before ICSI is required for sheep embryonic development.

Authors:  Debora A Anzalone; Domenico Iuso; Marta Czernik; Grazyna Ptak; Pasqualino Loi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Candidate gene expression patterns in rabbit preimplantation embryos developed in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Gibence Rose Winnie Henderson; Sambasiva Rao Brahmasani; Uma Mahesh Yelisetti; Suman Konijeti; Venu Charan Katari; Shivaji Sisinthy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Is prnt a pseudogene? Identification of ram Prt in testis and ejaculated spermatozoa.

Authors:  Jorge Pimenta; Ana Domingos; Pedro Santos; Carla C Marques; Cátia Cantante; Ana Santos; João P Barbas; Maria C Baptista; António E M Horta; Aldino Viegas; Patrícia Mesquita; João Gonçalves; Carlos A Fontes; José A M Prates; Rosa M L N Pereira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Synergies between assisted reproduction technologies and functional genomics.

Authors:  Pasqualino Loi; Paola Toschi; Federica Zacchini; Grazyna Ptak; Pier A Scapolo; Emanuele Capra; Alessandra Stella; Paolo Ajmone Marsan; John L Williams
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  From reproductive technologies to genome editing in small ruminants: an embryo's journey.

Authors:  Alejo Menchaca; Pedro C Dos Santos-Neto; Frederico Cuadro; Marcela Souza-Neves; Martina Crispo
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Effects of Vitrification on Immature and in vitro Matured, Denuded and Cumulus Compact Goat Oocytes and Their Subsequent Fertilization.

Authors:  Govind Narayan Purohit; Harikesh Meena; Kanika Solanki
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2012-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.