BACKGROUND: Dementia screening instruments, such as the Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG), measure a variety of cognitive functions. However, memory impairment generally is the first sign of Alzheimer's disease (AD). It seems logical, therefore, to use only memory-related items for the early detection of AD. We divided the CAMCOG into a memory section and a non-memory section, and tested the hypothesis that the memory section predicts AD better than the non-memory section. We also provide normative data for both sections. METHODS: Normal subjects (N = 169) and patients with incident AD (i.e. satisfying AD criteria between 1 and 3 years from baseline: N = 25) were participants in the Amsterdam Study of the Elderly (AMSTEL), a population-based longitudinal study on cognitive decline and dementia. Patients with prevalent AD (i.e. satisfying AD criteria at baseline: N = 155) were either recruited in a memory clinic or came from AMSTEL. Normal subjects were cognitively intact at baseline and remained so for at least 3 years. The CAMCOG was administered to all subjects. AD was diagnosed by DSM-III-R criteria. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis showed that the memory section was related to prevalent AD, whereas in multivariate analysis the non-memory section was not (after correction for the memory score and demographic characteristics). A similar analysis showed that the memory section predicted incident AD, as did a higher score on the non-memory section. The MMSE did not predict incident AD better than age alone. CONCLUSION: For the early detection of AD it is best to use the memory and non-memory sections separately instead of the total CAMCOG score.
BACKGROUND:Dementia screening instruments, such as the Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG), measure a variety of cognitive functions. However, memory impairment generally is the first sign of Alzheimer's disease (AD). It seems logical, therefore, to use only memory-related items for the early detection of AD. We divided the CAMCOG into a memory section and a non-memory section, and tested the hypothesis that the memory section predicts AD better than the non-memory section. We also provide normative data for both sections. METHODS: Normal subjects (N = 169) and patients with incident AD (i.e. satisfying AD criteria between 1 and 3 years from baseline: N = 25) were participants in the Amsterdam Study of the Elderly (AMSTEL), a population-based longitudinal study on cognitive decline and dementia. Patients with prevalent AD (i.e. satisfying AD criteria at baseline: N = 155) were either recruited in a memory clinic or came from AMSTEL. Normal subjects were cognitively intact at baseline and remained so for at least 3 years. The CAMCOG was administered to all subjects. AD was diagnosed by DSM-III-R criteria. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis showed that the memory section was related to prevalent AD, whereas in multivariate analysis the non-memory section was not (after correction for the memory score and demographic characteristics). A similar analysis showed that the memory section predicted incident AD, as did a higher score on the non-memory section. The MMSE did not predict incident AD better than age alone. CONCLUSION: For the early detection of AD it is best to use the memory and non-memory sections separately instead of the total CAMCOG score.
Authors: Xia Wu; Rui Li; Adam S Fleisher; Eric M Reiman; Xiaoting Guan; Yumei Zhang; Kewei Chen; Li Yao Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-01-21 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: M Combrinck; J Williams; M A De Berardinis; D Warden; M Puopolo; A D Smith; L Minghetti Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2005-06-08 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Sagrario Martín-Aragón; Paloma Bermejo-Bescós; Juana Benedí; Emanuela Felici; Pedro Gil; José Manuel Ribera; Angel Ma Villar Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Hans Wouters; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Willem A van Gool; Ben Schmand; Robert Lindeboom Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Paloma Bermejo-Bescós; Sagrario Martín-Aragón; Karim Jiménez-Aliaga; Juana Benedí; Emanuela Felici; Pedro Gil; José Manuel Ribera; Angel María Villar Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Pim van den Dungen; Eric P Moll van Charante; Peter M van de Ven; Gerbrand Foppes; Jos P C M van Campen; Harm W J van Marwijk; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Hein P J van Hout Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Pim van den Dungen; Eric P Moll van Charante; Harm W J van Marwijk; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Peter M van de Ven; Hein P J van Hout Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-08-04 Impact factor: 3.295