Literature DB >> 10883422

EMG biofeedback assisted KT-1000 evaluation of anterior tibial displacement.

J Feller1, C Hoser, K Webster.   

Abstract

Two studies were undertaken to evaluate the use of EMG biofeedback to encourage hamstring relaxation during KT-1000 measurement of anterior tibial displacement. In study 1, 60 ACL-deficient patients were studied in three groups using 15 lb and 20 lb in each group: in group 1 the patients were simply retested 15 min after the initial test sequence, in group 2 they were initially retested with EMG biofeedback and then again without, and in group 3 they were retested twice with EMG biofeedback. No significant difference in mean anterior tibial displacement was seen between the initial measurements and retest measurements when no EMG biofeedback was used. A significant increase in mean anterior tibial displacement was seen when the retesting was performed with EMG biofeedback. No further increase was seen with repeated retesting with EMG biofeedback. In study 2, 40 patients were evaluated 4-12 months following ACL reconstruction. KT-1000 measurements of anterior tibial displacement of both the operated and non-operated knees were made at 15 lb and 30 lb with and without the use of EMG biofeedback. EMG biofeedback was associated with a significant increase in unilateral measurement of anterior tibial displacement. When side-to-side differences were compared, there was a small but statistically significant increase in anterior tibial displacement with the use of EMG biofeedback. Although the use of EMG biofeedback to encourage hamstring relaxation does increase unilateral measurements of anterior tibial displacement, it does not appear to have a clinically significant effect on measurement of side-to-side difference. It may have a role in testing patients who have difficulty achieving hamstring relaxation or in aiding inexperienced examiners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10883422     DOI: 10.1007/s001670050202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  4 in total

1.  The effect of thigh muscle activity on anterior knee laxity in the uninjured and anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee.

Authors:  Massimo G Barcellona; Matthew C Morrissey; Peter Milligan; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity.

Authors:  Caroline Mouton; Daniel Theisen; Romain Seil
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

3.  Anterior laxity and patient-reported outcomes 7 years after ACL reconstruction with a fresh-frozen tibialis allograft.

Authors:  Emily Meike; S M Howell; M L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Knee-laxity measurements examined by a left-hand- and a right-hand-dominant physiotherapist, in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries and healthy controls.

Authors:  Ninni Sernert; Janett Helmers; Catarina Kartus; Lars Ejerhed; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 4.342

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.