Literature DB >> 10883336

Intracranial pressure processing with artificial neural networks: prediction of ICP trends.

M Swiercz1, Z Mariak, J Krejza, J Lewko, P Szydlik.   

Abstract

It is well known that intracranial pressure (ICP) is influenced by an array of predictable and unpredictable factors, which gives rise to a signal heavily loaded with stochastic, i.e. random components. Hence, statistical modelling of this signal has proved to be of limited utility, in spite of the very sophisticated mathematical methods applied. In recent years, neural network algorithms (ANN), which are an alternative to statistical methods, have proved their effectiveness in the prediction of trends, as applied in a variety of medical and non-medical tasks. We therefore attempted to test the efficiency of neural models in the on-line prediction of ICP values, compare their effectiveness to statistically oriented algorithms and combine ANN methods with some newer signal processing algorithms, like wavelet decomposition. Prediction horizons of up to 5 minutes have been tested with various architectures of the neural predictor. For a 3 minute prediction horizon, a satisfactory accuracy of forecasting has been achieved with "plain" ANN, as expressed by the "average relative variance coefficient". This was measured by the ratio of the prediction error obtained, in relation to the error which would occur if a current value were taken as the forecasted one. The prediction quality with statistical autoregressive models has proved unsatisfactory, whilst the result obtained using the ANN model with the wavelet transform incorporated, performed significantly better than the ANN models alone. The prediction quality obtained with the ANN methodology seems to be satisfactory over a short time horizon, though no conclusion can be derived at this stage of the study, as to the clinical utility of this method. In particular, even with this methodology, it is not possible to forecast any sudden dehiscencies of the ICP signal with any practical reliability. From the point of view of modelling theory, such sharp deviations of the signal may be regarded as a "catastrophe". This implies the necessity for a different approach to the ICP signal analysis with the artificial intelligence methodology; one, that is more oriented towards the global properties of the signal.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10883336     DOI: 10.1007/s007010050449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  7 in total

1.  Intracranial hypertension prediction using extremely randomized decision trees.

Authors:  Fabien Scalzo; Robert Hamilton; Shadnaz Asgari; Sunghan Kim; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Outcome Prediction for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury with Dynamic Features from Intracranial Pressure and Arterial Blood Pressure Signals: A Gaussian Process Approach.

Authors:  Marco A F Pimentel; Thomas Brennan; Li-Wei Lehman; Nicolas Kon Kam King; Beng-Ti Ang; Mengling Feng
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2016

Review 3.  Brain ischemia in patients with intracranial hemorrhage: pathophysiological reasoning for aggressive diagnostic management.

Authors:  Daniel Naranjo; Michal Arkuszewski; Wojciech Rudzinski; Elias R Melhem; Jaroslaw Krejza
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2013-12-18

4.  Learning vector quantization neural networks improve accuracy of transcranial color-coded duplex sonography in detection of middle cerebral artery spasm--preliminary report.

Authors:  Miroslaw Swiercz; Jan Kochanowicz; John Weigele; Robert Hurst; David S Liebeskind; Zenon Mariak; Elias R Melhem; Jaroslaw Krejza
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2008-08-13

5.  Predicting Intracranial Pressure and Brain Tissue Oxygen Crises in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Risa B Myers; Christos Lazaridis; Christopher M Jermaine; Claudia S Robertson; Craig G Rusin
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 6.  Intracranial Pressure Monitoring-Review and Avenues for Development.

Authors:  Maya Harary; Rianne G F Dolmans; William B Gormley
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Clinical Decision Support for Traumatic Brain Injury: Identifying a Framework for Practical Model-Based Intracranial Pressure Estimation at Multihour Timescales.

Authors:  J N Stroh; Tellen D Bennett; Vitaly Kheyfets; David Albers
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-03-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.