BACKGROUND: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the potassium channel opener pinacidil (Pin) as a pretreatment (PT) agent or additive to St. Thomas' solution (StT) could enhance myocardial protection. METHODS: In a parabiotic rabbit Langendorff model, 36 hearts underwent global normothermic ischemia (1 hour) followed by reperfusion (30 minutes). Cardioplegia (50 mL, every 20 minutes) consisted of: StT; PinPT/StT, where Pin PT preceded StT arrest; Pin alone; Pin in StT (Pin/StT); and Pin in low potassium StT. Systolic function after reperfusion (percent recovery of developed pressure) and compliance (diastolic slope from pressure-volume relationship) were measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between StT and PinPT/StT in percent recovery of developed pressure (51.54% +/- 3.5%, 42.17% +/- 4.0%, respectively) or compliance. Likewise, no significant differences occurred between Pin, StT, Pin/StT, and Pin in low potassium StT in percent recovery of developed pressure (58.99% +/- 4.8%, 51.54% +/- 3.5%, 53.09% +/- 3.2%, 66.43% +/- 7.3%, respectively) or compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Pin is as effective a cardioplegic agent as StT; however, its use as a pretreatment or additive to traditional and Pin in low potassium StT provided no additional benefit in functional recovery.
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the potassium channel opener pinacidil (Pin) as a pretreatment (PT) agent or additive to St. Thomas' solution (StT) could enhance myocardial protection. METHODS: In a parabiotic rabbit Langendorff model, 36 hearts underwent global normothermic ischemia (1 hour) followed by reperfusion (30 minutes). Cardioplegia (50 mL, every 20 minutes) consisted of: StT; PinPT/StT, where Pin PT preceded StT arrest; Pin alone; Pin in StT (Pin/StT); and Pin in low potassium StT. Systolic function after reperfusion (percent recovery of developed pressure) and compliance (diastolic slope from pressure-volume relationship) were measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between StT and PinPT/StT in percent recovery of developed pressure (51.54% +/- 3.5%, 42.17% +/- 4.0%, respectively) or compliance. Likewise, no significant differences occurred between Pin, StT, Pin/StT, and Pin in low potassium StT in percent recovery of developed pressure (58.99% +/- 4.8%, 51.54% +/- 3.5%, 53.09% +/- 3.2%, 66.43% +/- 7.3%, respectively) or compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Pin is as effective a cardioplegic agent as StT; however, its use as a pretreatment or additive to traditional and Pin in low potassium StT provided no additional benefit in functional recovery.
Authors: James D McCully; Hidetaka Wakiyama; Douglas B Cowan; Micheline Federman; Robert A Parker; Sidney Levitsky Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.330