BACKGROUND: Intrinsic abnormality of the aortic wall may explain the association of bicuspid aortic valves with ascending aortic aneurysms. Separate valve and graft repair of such lesions, rather than composite valve graft replacement, is more straightforward but leaves potentially abnormal sinuses behind. METHODS: Between January 1985 and January 1998, 45 patients underwent separate valve and graft (n = 27) or composite valve graft (n = 18) for an ascending aortic aneurysm and bicuspid aortic valve. Perioperative events and late results were compared. RESULTS: Patients undergoing separate valve and graft were older (mean age, 60 +/- 13 vs 42 +/- 12 years, p < 0.001) and were more likely to have purely stenotic (48% vs 6%, p = 0.003) than purely regurgitant (11% vs 72%, p < 0.001) disease. They were also more likely to require concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (56% vs 6%, p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in operative risk and no known late complications related to recurrent aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Root replacement with a composite valve graft can be accomplished with low operative risk and is the first choice for repair of this lesion. Separate valve and graft repair, however, yields satisfactory early and late results and remains an acceptable option, especially when the coronary ostea are not displaced or when concomitant procedures must be performed.
BACKGROUND: Intrinsic abnormality of the aortic wall may explain the association of bicuspid aortic valves with ascending aortic aneurysms. Separate valve and graft repair of such lesions, rather than composite valve graft replacement, is more straightforward but leaves potentially abnormal sinuses behind. METHODS: Between January 1985 and January 1998, 45 patients underwent separate valve and graft (n = 27) or composite valve graft (n = 18) for an ascending aortic aneurysm and bicuspid aortic valve. Perioperative events and late results were compared. RESULTS:Patients undergoing separate valve and graft were older (mean age, 60 +/- 13 vs 42 +/- 12 years, p < 0.001) and were more likely to have purely stenotic (48% vs 6%, p = 0.003) than purely regurgitant (11% vs 72%, p < 0.001) disease. They were also more likely to require concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (56% vs 6%, p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in operative risk and no known late complications related to recurrent aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Root replacement with a composite valve graft can be accomplished with low operative risk and is the first choice for repair of this lesion. Separate valve and graft repair, however, yields satisfactory early and late results and remains an acceptable option, especially when the coronary ostea are not displaced or when concomitant procedures must be performed.
Authors: Yuanjia Zhu; Eric E Roselli; Jay J Idrees; Charles M Wojnarski; Brian Griffin; Vidyasagar Kalahasti; Gosta Pettersson; Lars G Svensson Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Christian D Etz; Martin Misfeld; Michael A Borger; Maximilian Luehr; Elfriede Strotdrees; Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr Journal: Cardiol Res Pract Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 1.866