Literature DB >> 10881460

Normal values of plantar pressure measurements determined using the EMED-SF system.

A R Bryant1, P Tinley, K P Singer.   

Abstract

Plantar pressure-measurement technology is being increasingly used by podiatric physicians and surgeons in both clinical practice and research. The authors present normal reference-range values for peak pressure, mean pressure, and pressure-time integral obtained from 30 healthy subjects using a two-step recording technique and the EMED-SF system, as background for proposed clinical trials. Normative data of this type are essential for clinical practice in the comparison of plantar pressure-measurement values of individual patients with those of normal, asymptomatic feet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10881460     DOI: 10.7547/87507315-90-6-295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc        ISSN: 1930-8264


  7 in total

1.  Are Pressure Time Integral and Cumulative Plantar Stress Related to First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Pain? Results From a Community-Based Study.

Authors:  Smita Rao; K Douglas Gross; Jingbo Niu; Michael C Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; James C Torner; Jean Hietpas; David Felson; Howard J Hillstrom
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Relationships between segmental foot mobility and plantar loading in individuals with and without diabetes and neuropathy.

Authors:  Smita Rao; Charles L Saltzman; H John Yack
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Rehabilitation for Chronic Ankle Instability With or Without Destabilization Devices: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Luke Donovan; Joseph M Hart; Susan A Saliba; Joseph Park; Mark Anthony Feger; Christopher C Herb; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Testing the proficiency to distinguish locations with elevated plantar pressure within and between professional groups of foot therapists.

Authors:  Nick A Guldemond; Pieter Leffers; Fred H M Nieman; Antal P Sanders; Nicolaas C Schaper; Geert H I M Walenkamp
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Reliability of the Footscan® Platform System in Healthy Subjects: A Comparison of without Top-Layer and with Top-Layer Protocols.

Authors:  Chao Xu; Xin-Xin Wen; Lu-Yu Huang; Lei Shang; Zhao Yang; Ya-Bo Yan; Wei Lei
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Standard reference values of weight and maximum pressure distribution in healthy adults aged 18-65 years in Germany.

Authors:  D Ohlendorf; K Kerth; W Osiander; F Holzgreve; L Fraeulin; H Ackermann; D A Groneberg
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.867

7.  Normal foot loading parameters and repeatability of the Footscan® platform system.

Authors:  Chao Xu; Xin-Xin Wen; Lu-Yu Huang; Lei Shang; Xi-Xia Cheng; Ya-Bo Yan; Wei Lei
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.303

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.