Literature DB >> 10880675

Sensitivity to ethanol-induced motor incoordination in FAST and SLOW selectively bred mice.

S L Boehm1, J C Crabbe, T J Phillips.   

Abstract

Earlier studies using the grid test have indicated a negative genetic correlation between sensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation and ethanol-induced motor incoordination in FAST and SLOW mice, lines selectively bred for differential sensitivity to ethanol's stimulant effects. Because different tests of motor coordination may not measure the same behavioral competencies or physiological substrates, the present experiments tested adult ethanol- or saline-exposed FAST and SLOW mice of two replicates (FAST-1, FAST-2, SLOW-1, and SLOW-2) using three additional tests of coordination: a stationary dowel, fixed-speed rotarod, and accelerating rotarod. After ethanol treatment, FAST-1 mice fell from the stationary dowel at shorter latencies than SLOW-1 mice, suggesting that they had relatively greater sensitivity to ethanol. However, brain ethanol concentrations (BrECs) were similar at time of fall, and no differences were found between replicate-2 lines. SLOW-1 mice fell from the fixed-speed rotarod at lower BrECs than FAST-1 mice, suggesting possibly greater sensitivity of the SLOW-1 line. Again, no replicate-2 line differences were found. No significant differences were detected for the accelerating rotarod. These results provide little support for a negative genetic relationship between sensitivity to the stimulant and ataxic effects of ethanol using these measures of motor coordination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10880675     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(00)00264-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  7 in total

1.  α-Lipoic acid, a scavenging agent for H₂O₂, reduces ethanol-stimulated locomotion in mice.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Ledesma; Carlos M G Aragon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Do initial responses to drugs predict future use or abuse?

Authors:  Harriet de Wit; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Acquisition and reconditioning of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice is blocked by the H₂O₂ scavenger alpha lipoic acid.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Ledesma; Carlos M G Aragon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  GABAB receptor activation attenuates the stimulant but not mesolimbic dopamine response to ethanol in FAST mice.

Authors:  Sarah E Holstein; Na Li; Amy J Eshleman; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Immunization with amyloid-beta attenuates inclusion body myositis-like myopathology and motor impairment in a transgenic mouse model.

Authors:  Masashi Kitazawa; Vitaly Vasilevko; David H Cribbs; Frank M LaFerla
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Combined scopolamine and ethanol treatment results in a locomotor stimulant response suggestive of synergism that is not blocked by dopamine receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Angela C Scibelli; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Short-term selection for acute ethanol tolerance and sensitization from an F2 population derived from the high and low alcohol-sensitive selectively bred rat lines.

Authors:  Richard A Radcliffe; Pequita Bludeau; Xin-Sheng Deng; V Gene Erwin; Richard A Deitrich
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.405

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.