Literature DB >> 10879694

Static and dynamic MRI of a urinary control intra-vaginal device.

A J Maubon1, M P Boncoeur-Martel, V Juhan, C R Courtieu, A S Thurmond, P Aubas, P Marès, J P Rouanet.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to describe by MRI, in dynamic conditions at rest and straining, the anatomical modifications induced by a commercially available intravaginal device (IVD) aimed at relieving female stress urinary incontinence. Ten female patients complaining of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) had pelvic MRI with static and dynamic sequences, without and with a self-inserted IVD. We studied positions and angulations of the IVD in the pelvis. Paired t-test allowed comparisons of: position of the bladder neck; urethral angulation with the pubis axis; position of the urethra; and posterior urethro-vesical angle (PUVA) without and with IVD. At rest, in ten of ten cases IVD laid cranial to the pubo-rectal muscle; with an average angulation of 95 +/- 10 degrees with the pubis axis, laterally tilted in three of ten cases. In maximum straining with IVD bladder neck descent was lower by an average of 5.2 +/- 3.1 mm (p = 0.001), pubo-urethral angle opening was smaller by an average of 22 +/- 20 degrees (p = 0.015), and bladder neck to pubis distance was shorter by an average of 5.7 +/- 4 mm. Posterior urethro-vesical angle was not significantly modified. Dynamic MRI allowed a non-invasive assessment of the mode of action of an IVD. The main modifications were a support of the bladder base and bladder neck, with a superior displacement of the urethra toward the pubis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10879694     DOI: 10.1007/s003300051028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  22 in total

1.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Introl bladder neck support prosthesis: international clinical experience.

Authors:  G W Davila; A Kondo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1997

Review 3.  Anatomy and physiology of urinary continence.

Authors:  J O DeLancey
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Vaginal ultrasound studies before and after successful colposuspension and in continent controls.

Authors:  M E Vierhout; M Hol
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  First report on the standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1976-02

Review 6.  Stress urinary incontinence: where are we now, where should we go?

Authors:  J O DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging.

Authors:  D Vanbeckevoort; L Van Hoe; R Oyen; E Ponette; D De Ridder; J Deprest
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system.

Authors:  A W Schoenenberger; J F Debatin; I Guldenschuh; T F Hany; P Steiner; G P Krestin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Role of the Q-tip test in evaluating stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A Bergman; T A McCarthy; C A Ballard; J Yanai
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 0.142

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the levator ani with anatomic correlation.

Authors:  K Strohbehn; J H Ellis; J A Strohbehn; J O DeLancey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  2 in total

1.  Vaginal pessaries in managing women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: patient characteristics and factors contributing to success.

Authors:  Lesley-Ann M Hanson; Jane A Schulz; Catherine G Flood; Bonita Cooley; Florence Tam
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-07-26

2.  Restoration of continence by pessaries: magnetic resonance imaging assessment of mechanism of action.

Authors:  Yuko M Komesu; Loren H Ketai; Rebecca G Rogers; Steven C Eberhardt; Jennifer Pohl
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 8.661

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.