Literature DB >> 10879382

Temporal and geographical trends in indications for implantation of cardiac defibrillators in Europe 1993-1998. Medtronic ICD System Investigators.

X Copie1, O Piot, M A Said, T Lavergne, J Ollitrault, L Guize, J Y Le Heuzey.   

Abstract

Despite the demonstrated efficacy of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in reducing sudden and total mortality in selected populations, their implantation rates vary greatly between countries. The aim of our study was to analyze temporal and geographical trends in ICD implantations in countries with similar health related expenditure in Western Europe. A total of 2,257 patients from ten European evaluation studies of Medtronic defibrillators and defibrillation electrodes, conducted between 1993 and 1998, representing 12 countries, was included in this analysis. Rates of implantation and clinical characteristics were compared between countries and years of implantation. Rates of implantation differed greatly between Western European countries and did not correlate with indices of health related expenditure (i.e., number of patients per physician and number of patients per hospital bed). However, there was a strong and statistically significant negative correlation between the use of amiodarone and the rates of implantation (r = -0.66, P = 0.02). Temporal trends showed a significant increase in the age of the patients receiving an ICD between 1993 and 1998 (57 +/- 14 vs 61 +/- 12 years, mean +/- SD, P < 0.001). There was also a temporal trend towards an increased incidence of coronary artery disease and a significant decrease in the incidence of cardiomyopathy. There was a temporal increase in implantations in patients with a history of ventricular tachycardia. Despite a general scientific agreement that ICDs are a first line treatment for patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death, their acceptance remains low in several developed countries. This low acceptance may not be entirely related to budget constraint but may also be related to their perceived efficacy by physicians and health authorities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10879382     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00884.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  2 in total

1.  [MADIT II--or how seriously do we take primary prevention of sudden cardiac death?].

Authors:  Helmut U Klein
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-03-31       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  [The impact of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II in a university hospital--do all patients with myocardial infarction and reduced left ventricular function need an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator?].

Authors:  Peter Lercher; Brigitte Rotman; Daniel Scherr; Wilfried Kraxner; Olef Luha; Werner Klein
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-03-31       Impact factor: 1.704

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.