Literature DB >> 10878430

Role of a stroke data bank in evaluating cerebral infarction subtypes: patterns and outcome of 1,776 consecutive patients from the Besançon stroke registry.

T Moulin1, L Tatu, F Vuillier, E Berger, D Chavot, L Rumbach.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency of various risk factors, courses and outcome of infarct subtypes in a large hospital-based stroke registry.
METHODS: From 1987 to 1994, 1,776 stroke patients with a first-ever infarction were included in the Besançon Stroke Registry. All patients were evaluated by a standard protocol (risk factors, stroke onset, stroke courses, clinical characteristics, neuroimaging, Doppler ultrasonography and cardiac investigations). Outcome was evaluated at 30 days using the Rankin scale.
RESULTS: There were 1,012 men (mean age 67.2 +/- 13.7 years) and 764 women (mean age 71.4 +/- 15.6 years). At least two neuroimaging examinations were performed in 81.4% (n = 1,446) of the patients and an infarct was visible in 80.9% (n = 1,436). The second neuroimaging examination (CT or MRI) was performed after 8.2 +/- 1.6 days. 85.4% of patients were admitted on the first day of the stroke: 28.3% within 3 h and 48.4% within 6 h. In addition, stroke severity was well correlated with the short time interval between stroke onset and admission. Past medical history of hypertension was the major risk factor occurring in 57.5% of all types of infarction. While diabetes was more frequently found in small deep infarct, atrial fibrillation and history of heart failure were found in anterior circulation infarcts. The distribution of clinical presentations was conventional. Hemorrhagic transformation was found in 14.9% of the patients, especially in MCA and PCA infarcts. In all patients, logistic regression analysis determined independent predictive factors for death: clinical deterioration at the 48th hour (OR 7.5, 95% CI 4.9-11.3), initial loss of consciousness (OR 3. 3, 95% CI 2.1-4.9), age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06), complete motor deficit (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.7-3.8), history of heart failure (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-3.0), lacunar syndrome (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.10-0.60) and regressive stroke onset (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10-0.52). However, the outcome was clearly correlated with the infarct location. The in-hospital mortality rate was lowest in patients with small deep infarct (2.9%) or border zone infarcts (3.4%) and the highest in patients with total middle cerebral artery infarct (47.4%) or multiple infarcts (27.6%).
CONCLUSION: Our registry appears to be a useful tool to understand the course and outcome of a large group of nonselected patients with subtypes of infarction. It can also help to analyze the influence of specific stroke management in the different categories of stroke types. Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10878430     DOI: 10.1159/000016068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   2.762


  27 in total

1.  Are lacunar strokes really different? A systematic review of differences in risk factor profiles between lacunar and nonlacunar infarcts.

Authors:  Caroline Jackson; Cathie Sudlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Detection of vessel wall calcifications in vertebral arteries using susceptibility weighted imaging.

Authors:  Lisa C Adams; Sarah M Böker; Yvonne Y Bender; Eva M Fallenberg; Moritz Wagner; Thomas Liebig; Bernd Hamm; Marcus R Makowski
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Stroke Lesions in a Large Upper Limb Rehabilitation Trial Cohort Rarely Match Lesions in Common Preclinical Models.

Authors:  Matthew A Edwardson; Ximing Wang; Brent Liu; Li Ding; Christianne J Lane; Caron Park; Monica A Nelsen; Theresa A Jones; Steven L Wolf; Carolee J Winstein; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 4.  Interactions between age, sex, and hormones in experimental ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Fudong Liu; Louise D McCullough
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  New England medical center posterior circulation stroke registry: I. Methods, data base, distribution of brain lesions, stroke mechanisms, and outcomes.

Authors:  Lr Caplan; C-S Chung; Rj Wityk; Ta Glass; J Tapia; L Pazdera; H-M Chang; Jf Dashe; Cj Chaves; K Vemmos; M Leary; Ld Dewitt; Ms Pessin
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  Clustering of vascular risk factors and in-hospital death after acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  J Roquer; A Ois; A Rodríguez Campello; M Gomis; E Munteis; J Jiménez Conde; J E Martínez-Rodríguez
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Posterior circulation ischemic stroke-clinical characteristics, risk factors, and subtypes in a north Indian population: a prospective study.

Authors:  Manmohan Mehndiratta; Sanjay Pandey; Rajeev Nayak; Anwar Alam
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2012-04

Review 8.  Cerebral ischemic stroke: is gender important?

Authors:  Claire L Gibson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Stroke syndromes associated with DWI-negative MRI include ataxic hemiparesis and isolated internuclear ophthalmoplegia.

Authors:  Jennifer Watts; Brad Wood; Andrew Kelly; Anthony Alvaro
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2013-06

10.  Infarction in the territory of the anterior cerebral artery: clinical study of 51 patients.

Authors:  Adrià Arboix; Luis García-Eroles; Núria Sellarés; Agnès Raga; Montserrat Oliveres; Joan Massons
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.474

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.