Literature DB >> 10878143

A comparison of the socioeconomic and health status characteristics of uninsured, state Children's health insurance program-eligible children in the united states with those of other groups of insured children: implications for policy.

G R Byck1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the sociodemographic and health status characteristics of the national uninsured, State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)-eligible population, and to compare this population with Medicaid-enrolled children, privately insured children, and privately insured children who have family income in the SCHIP eligibility range. PROCEDURES: Data were analyzed for 50 950 children 0 to 18 years of age included in the 1993 and 1994 National Health Interview Surveys. The survey obtained information on insurance coverage and sociodemographic and health status measures. Bivariate analyses were conducted to identify the relationships between SCHIP eligibility and sociodemographic and health status characteristics. Multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the independent association of the sociodemographic and health status variables with the likelihood of being uninsured, SCHIP-eligible. PRIMARY
FINDINGS: Results indicate that SCHIP children exhibit markedly different socioeconomic and health status characteristics than do both Medicaid- enrolled and privately insured children, although these differences are less significant in privately insured children. SCHIP children more often live with college- educated (39.4%) and employed adults (91.2%) than do Medicaid-enrolled children (23.0% and 53.9%, respectively). However, SCHIP children live with college-educated and employed adults less than do all privately insured children (66.7% and 96.9%, respectively) and privately insured/same-income children (57.8% and 97.0%, respectively). Parents of SCHIP-eligible children are also disproportionately self-employed or employed in industries (e.g., retail trade) and occupations in which health insurance coverage is less available or affordable. SCHIP-eligible children are also 2 times more likely to be adolescents and 11/2 times more likely to be in excellent health than Medicaid-eligible children. Compared with privately insured children, SCHIP-eligible children are nearly 3 times more likely to be Hispanic and nearly 2 times more likely to be rated in fair or poor health.
CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that uninsured, SCHIP-eligible children are substantially different from children in these groups, particularly compared with Medicaid-enrolled children. These differences need to be taken into account when setting policies and implementing programs intended to increase health insurance coverage and access to health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10878143     DOI: 10.1542/peds.106.1.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  8 in total

1.  Generational differences in U.S. public spending, 1980-2000.

Authors:  Susmita Pati; Ron Keren; Evaline A Alessandrini; Donald F Schwarz
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Health Care Utilization among Children Enrolled in Medicaid and CHIP via Express Lane Eligibility.

Authors:  Margaret Colby; Brenda Natzke
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Insurance gaps among vulnerable children in the United States, 1999-2001.

Authors:  Marlon Satchell; Susmita Pati
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Bringing health and social policy together: the case of the earned income tax credit.

Authors:  Peter S Arno; Nancy Sohler; Deborah Viola; Clyde Schechter
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.222

5.  Necrotizing soft-tissue infections: differences in patients treated at burn centers and non-burn centers.

Authors:  Frederick W Endorf; Matthew B Klein; Christopher D Mack; Gregory J Jurkovich; Frederick P Rivara
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

6.  The impact of the public insurance expansions on children's use of preventive dental care.

Authors:  Chi-Chi Liao; Michael Lee Ganz; Hongyu Jiang; Theodore Chelmow
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2008-12-09

7.  A multi-national comparison of antipsychotic drug use in children and adolescents, 2005-2012.

Authors:  Luuk J Kalverdijk; Christian J Bachmann; Lise Aagaard; Mehmet Burcu; Gerd Glaeske; Falk Hoffmann; Irene Petersen; Catharina C M Schuiling-Veninga; Linda P Wijlaars; Julie M Zito
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.033

8.  A three-country comparison of psychotropic medication prevalence in youth.

Authors:  Julie M Zito; Daniel J Safer; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg; Katrin Janhsen; Joerg M Fegert; James F Gardner; Gerd Glaeske; Satish C Valluri
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.033

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.