Literature DB >> 10878124

Phylogeny and functional conservation of sigma(E) in endospore-forming bacteria.

E F Arcuri1, M Wiedmann, K J Boor.   

Abstract

Conservation of the sporulation processes between Bacillus spp. and Clostridium spp. was investigated through evolutionary and complementation analyses of sigma(E). Alignment of partial predicted sigma(E) amino acid sequences from three Bacillus spp., Paenibacillus polymyxa and five Clostridium spp. revealed that amino acid residues previously reported to be involved in promoter utilization (M124, E119 and N120) and strand opening (C117) are conserved among all these species. Phylogenetic analyses of various sigma factor sequences from endospore-forming bacteria revealed that homologues of sigma(E), sigma(K) and sigma(G) clustered together regardless of genus, suggesting a common origin of sporulation sigma factors. The functional equivalence between Clostridium acetobutylicum sigma(E) and Bacillus subtilis sigma(E) was investigated by complementing a non-polar B. subtilis sigma(E) null mutant with the spoIIG operon from either B. subtilis (spoIIG(Bs)) or C. acetobutylicum (spoIIG(Ca)). Single-copy integration of spoIIG(Bs) into the amyE locus of the sigma(E) null mutant completely restored the wild-type sporulation phenotype, while spoIIG(Ca) only partially restored sporulation. Maximal expression of spoIIG(Ca)-lacZ occurred approximately 12 h later than maximal expression of spoIIG(Bs)-lacZ. Differences in temporal expression patterns for spoIIG(Ca) and spoIIG(Bs) in the B. subtilis background may at least partially explain the observed sporulation complementation phenotypes. This study suggests a common phylogenetic ancestor for sigma(E) in Bacillus spp. and Clostridium spp., although regulation of sigma(E) expression may differ in these two genera.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10878124     DOI: 10.1099/00221287-146-7-1593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiology        ISSN: 1350-0872            Impact factor:   2.777


  5 in total

Review 1.  Compartmentalization of gene expression during Bacillus subtilis spore formation.

Authors:  David W Hilbert; Patrick J Piggot
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Inactivation of σE and σG in Clostridium acetobutylicum illuminates their roles in clostridial-cell-form biogenesis, granulose synthesis, solventogenesis, and spore morphogenesis.

Authors:  Bryan P Tracy; Shawn W Jones; Eleftherios T Papoutsakis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Inactivation of σF in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 blocks sporulation prior to asymmetric division and abolishes σE and σG protein expression but does not block solvent formation.

Authors:  Shawn W Jones; Bryan P Tracy; Stefan M Gaida; Eleftherios T Papoutsakis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Genetic and immunological comparison of the cladoceran parasite Pasteuria ramosa with the nematode parasite Pasteuria penetrans.

Authors:  Liesbeth M Schmidt; Laurence Mouton; Guang Nong; Dieter Ebert; James F Preston
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Phylogeny in aid of the present and novel microbial lineages: diversity in Bacillus.

Authors:  Shalini Porwal; Sadhana Lal; Simrita Cheema; Vipin Chandra Kalia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.