Literature DB >> 10878019

Polarity exchange at the interface of regulators of G protein signaling with G protein alpha-subunits.

T Wieland1, N Bahtijari, X B Zhou, C Kleuss, M I Simon.   

Abstract

RGS proteins are GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) for G protein alpha-subunits. This GAP activity is mediated by the interaction of conserved residues on regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins and Galpha-subunits. We mutated the important contact sites Glu-89, Asn-90, and Asn-130 in RGS16 to lysine, aspartate, and alanine, respectively. The interaction of RGS16 and its mutants with Galpha(t) and Galpha(i1) was studied. The GAP activities of RGS16N90D and RGS16N130A were strongly attenuated. RGS16E89K increased GTP hydrolysis of Galpha(i1) by a similar extent, but with an about 100-fold reduced affinity compared with non-mutated RGS16. As Glu-89 in RGS16 is interacting with Lys-210 in Galpha(i1), this lysine was changed to glutamate for compensation. Galpha(i1)K210E was insensitive to RGS16 but interacted with RGS16E89K. In rat uterine smooth muscle cells, wild type RGS16 abolished G(i)-mediated alpha(2)-adrenoreceptor signaling, whereas RGS16E89K was without effect. Both Galpha(i1) and Galpha(i1)K210E mimicked the effect of alpha(2)-adrenoreceptor stimulation. Galpha(i1)K210E was sensitive to RGS16E89K and 10-fold more potent than Galpha(i1). Analogous mutants of Galpha(q) (Galpha(q)K215E) and RGS4 (RGS4E87K) were created and studied in COS-7 cells. The activity of wild type Galpha(q) was counteracted by wild type RGS4 but not by RGS4E87K. The activity of Galpha(q)K215E was inhibited by RGS4E87K, whereas non-mutated RGS4 was ineffective. We conclude that mutation of a conserved lysine residue to glutamate in Galpha(i) and Galpha(q) family members renders these proteins insensitive to wild type RGS proteins. Nevertheless, they are sensitive to glutamate to lysine mutants of RGS proteins. Such mutant pairs will be helpful tools in analyzing Galpha-RGS specificities in living cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10878019     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M004187200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  7 in total

1.  A regulator of G protein signaling-containing kinase is important for chemotaxis and multicellular development in dictyostelium.

Authors:  Binggang Sun; Richard A Firtel
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Alteration of gene expression profiling including GPR174 and GNG2 is associated with vasovagal syncope.

Authors:  Yu-Juan Huang; Zai-wei Zhou; Miao Xu; Qing-wen Ma; Jing-bin Yan; Jian-yi Wang; Quo-qin Zhang; Min Huang; Liming Bao
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Structural determinants of G-protein alpha subunit selectivity by regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2).

Authors:  Adam J Kimple; Meera Soundararajan; Stephanie Q Hutsell; Annette K Roos; Daniel J Urban; Vincent Setola; Brenda R S Temple; Bryan L Roth; Stefan Knapp; Francis S Willard; David P Siderovski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Regulators of G-protein signaling and their Gα substrates: promises and challenges in their use as drug discovery targets.

Authors:  Adam J Kimple; Dustin E Bosch; Patrick M Giguère; David P Siderovski
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 25.468

5.  Adaptive evolution of signaling partners.

Authors:  Daisuke Urano; Taoran Dong; Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Alan M Jones
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Residue-level determinants of RGS R4 subfamily GAP activity and specificity towards the Gi subfamily.

Authors:  Ali Asli; Sabreen Higazy-Mreih; Meirav Avital-Shacham; Mickey Kosloff
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Integrating energy calculations with functional assays to decipher the specificity of G protein-RGS protein interactions.

Authors:  Mickey Kosloff; Amanda M Travis; Dustin E Bosch; David P Siderovski; Vadim Y Arshavsky
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 15.369

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.