Literature DB >> 10877794

Comparison of Cryptosporidium parvum viability and infectivity assays following ozone treatment of oocysts.

Z Bukhari1, M M Marshall, D G Korich, C R Fricker, H V Smith, J Rosen, J L Clancy.   

Abstract

Several in vitro surrogates have been developed as convenient, user-friendly alternatives to mouse infectivity assays for determining the viability of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts. Such viability assays have been used increasingly to determine oocyst inactivation following treatment with chemical, physical, or environmental stresses. Defining the relationship between in vitro viability assays and oocyst infectivity in susceptible hosts is critical for determining the significance of existing oocyst inactivation data for these in vitro assays and their suitability in future studies. In this study, four viability assays were compared with mouse infectivity assays, using neonatal CD-1 mice. Studies were conducted in the United States and United Kingdom using fresh (<1 month) or environmentally aged (3 months at 4 degrees C) oocysts, which were partially inactivated by ozonation before viability and/or infectivity analyses. High levels of variability were noted within and between the viability and infectivity assays in the U.S. and United Kingdom studies despite rigorous control over oocyst conditions and disinfection experiments. Based on the viability analysis of oocyst subsamples from each ozonation experiment, SYTO-59 assays demonstrated minimal change in oocyst viability, whereas 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole-propidium iodide assays, in vitro excystation, and SYTO-9 assays showed a marginal reduction in oocyst viability. In contrast, the neonatal mouse infectivity assay demonstrated significantly higher levels of oocyst inactivation in the U.S. and United Kingdom experiments. These comparisons illustrate that four in vitro viability assays cannot be used to reliably predict oocyst inactivation following treatment with low levels of ozone. Neonatal mouse infectivity assays should continue to be regarded as a "gold standard" until suitable alternative viability surrogates are identified for disinfection studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10877794      PMCID: PMC92099          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.7.2972-2980.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of animal infectivity and nucleic acid staining for assessment of Cryptosporidium parvum viability in water.

Authors:  N F Neumann; L L Gyürek; L Gammie; G R Finch; M Belosevic
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water: techniques for generating precise recovery data.

Authors:  D T Reynolds; R B Slade; N J Sykes; A Jonas; C R Fricker
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.772

3.  Improved purification methods for calf-derived Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts using discontinuous sucrose and cesium chloride gradients.

Authors:  M J Arrowood; K Donaldson
Journal:  J Eukaryot Microbiol       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  An assay combining cell culture with reverse transcriptase PCR to detect and determine the infectivity of waterborne Cryptosporidium parvum.

Authors:  P A Rochelle; D M Ferguson; T J Handojo; R De Leon; M H Stewart; R L Wolfe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Detection of infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in surface and filter backwash water samples by immunomagnetic separation and integrated cell culture-PCR.

Authors:  G D Di Giovanni; F H Hashemi; N J Shaw; F A Abrams; M W LeChevallier; M Abbaszadegan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Inter-laboratory comparison of the CD-1 neonatal mouse logistic dose-response model for Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.

Authors:  D G Korich; M M Marshall; H V Smith; J O'Grady; Z Bukhari; C R Fricker; J P Rosen; J L Clancy
Journal:  J Eukaryot Microbiol       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  beta-tubulin mRNA as a marker of Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst viability.

Authors:  G Widmer; E A Orbacz; S Tzipori
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  A most-probable-number assay for enumeration of infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.

Authors:  T R Slifko; D E Huffman; J B Rose
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  New cryptosporidium genotypes in HIV-infected persons.

Authors:  N J Pieniazek; F J Bornay-Llinares; S B Slemenda; A J da Silva; I N Moura; M J Arrowood; O Ditrich; D G Addiss
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Differentiating human from animal isolates of Cryptosporidium parvum.

Authors:  I M Sulaiman; L Xiao; C Yang; L Escalante; A Moore; C B Beard; M J Arrowood; A A Lal
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1998 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Cryptosporidiosis: environmental, therapeutic, and preventive challenges.

Authors:  S Collinet-Adler; H D Ward
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Evaluation of the effect of temperature on the die-off rate for Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in water, soils, and feces.

Authors:  X Peng; T Murphy; N M Holden
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Transport of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in soil columns following applications of raw and separated liquid slurries.

Authors:  Heidi H Petersen; Heidi L Enemark; Annette Olsen; M G Mostofa Amin; Anders Dalsgaard
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effects of combined water potential and temperature stresses on Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.

Authors:  M Walker; K Leddy; E Hager; E Hagar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Establishment of a germ carrier assay to assess disinfectant efficacy against oocysts of coccidian parasites.

Authors:  Ira Dresely; Arwid Daugschies; Matthias Lendner
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Determination of pyrimidine dimers in Escherichia coli and Cryptosporidium parvum during UV light inactivation, photoreactivation, and dark repair.

Authors:  K Oguma; H Katayama; H Mitani; S Morita; T Hirata; S Ohgaki
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Effectiveness of standard UV depuration at inactivating Cryptosporidium parvum recovered from spiked Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas).

Authors:  O Sunnotel; W J Snelling; N McDonough; L Browne; J E Moore; J S G Dooley; C J Lowery
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Cell culture-Taqman PCR assay for evaluation of Cryptosporidium parvum disinfection.

Authors:  Alexandra R Keegan; Stella Fanok; Paul T Monis; Christopher P Saint
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Monitoring of waterborne pathogens in surface waters in amsterdam, the Netherlands, and the potential health risk associated with exposure to cryptosporidium and giardia in these waters.

Authors:  F M Schets; J H van Wijnen; J F Schijven; H Schoon; A M de Roda Husman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Comparison of in vitro cell culture and a mouse assay for measuring infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum.

Authors:  Paul A Rochelle; Marilyn M Marshall; Jan R Mead; Anne M Johnson; Dick G Korich; Jeffrey S Rosen; Ricardo De Leon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.