Literature DB >> 10877775

Relationship between membrane damage and cell death in pressure-treated Escherichia coli cells: differences between exponential- and stationary-phase cells and variation among strains.

R Pagán1, B Mackey.   

Abstract

The relationship between membrane damage and loss of viability following pressure treatment was examined in Escherichia coli strains C9490, H1071, and NCTC 8003. These strains showed high, medium, and low resistance to pressure, respectively, in stationary phase but similar resistance to pressure in exponential phase. Loss of membrane integrity was measured as loss of osmotic responsiveness or as increased uptake of the fluorescent dye propidium iodide. In exponential-phase cells, loss of viability was correlated with a permanent loss of membrane integrity in all strains, whereas in stationary-phase cells, a more complicated picture emerged in which cell membranes became leaky during pressure treatment but resealed to a greater or lesser extent following decompression. Strain H1071 displayed a very unusual pressure response in stationary phase in which survival decreased to a minimum at 300 MPa but then increased at 400 to 500 MPa before decreasing again. Membranes were unable to reseal after treatment at 300 MPa but could do so after treatment at higher pressures. Membrane damage in this strain was thus typical of exponential-phase cells under low-pressure conditions but of stationary-phase cells under higher-pressure conditions. Heat shock treatment of strain H1071 cells increased pressure resistance under low-pressure conditions and also allowed membrane damage to reseal. Growth in the presence of IPTG (isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside) increased resistance under high-pressure conditions. The mechanisms of inactivation may thus differ at high and low pressures. These studies support the view that membrane damage is an important event in the inactivation of bacteria by high pressure, but the nature of membrane damage and its relation to cell death may differ between species and phases of growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10877775      PMCID: PMC92080          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.7.2829-2834.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

Review 1.  Microbial life at high pressures.

Authors:  D H Bartlett
Journal:  Sci Prog       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.774

2.  Hydrostatic pressure and electroporation have increased bactericidal efficiency in combination with bacteriocins.

Authors:  N Kalchayanand; T Sikes; C P Dunne; B Ray
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  The effects of pressure on the molecular structure and physiological functions of cell membranes.

Authors:  A G Macdonald
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1984-01-07       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The survival of Escherichia coli from freeze-thaw damage: permeability barrier damage and viability.

Authors:  P H Calcott; R A MacLeod
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Bacterial plasmolysis as a physical indicator of viability.

Authors:  D R Korber; A Choi; G M Wolfaardt; D E Caldwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on characteristics of pork slurries and inactivation of microorganisms associated with meat and meat products.

Authors:  T Shigehisa; T Ohmori; A Saito; S Taji; R Hayashi
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  The effects of hydrostatic pressure on ribosome conformation in Escherichia coli: and in vivo study using differential scanning calorimetry.

Authors:  Gordon W Niven; Christopher A Miles; Bernard M Mackey
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.777

8.  Comparative study of pressure-induced germination of Bacillus subtilis spores at low and high pressures.

Authors:  E Y Wuytack; S Boven; C W Michiels
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  The combined effect of high hydrostatic pressure and mild heat on inactivation of pathogens in milk and poultry.

Authors:  M F Patterson; D J Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.077

10.  Green fluorescent protein as a noninvasive stress probe in resting Escherichia coli cells.

Authors:  H J Cha; R Srivastava; V N Vakharia; G Rao; W E Bentley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  50 in total

1.  Enhanced acid sensitivity of pressure-damaged Escherichia coli O157 cells.

Authors:  R Pagán; S Jordan; A Benito; B Mackey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Role of membrane fluidity in pressure resistance of Escherichia coli NCTC 8164.

Authors:  M A Casadei; P Mañas; G Niven; E Needs; B M Mackey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Morphological and physiological changes induced by high hydrostatic pressure in exponential- and stationary-phase cells of Escherichia coli: relationship with cell death.

Authors:  Pilar Mañas; Bernard M Mackey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Biological approach to modeling of Staphylococcus aureus high-hydrostatic-pressure inactivation kinetics.

Authors:  Guillermo Cebrián; Chris W Michiels; Pilar Mañas; Santiago Condón
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Synergistic and antagonistic effects of combined subzero temperature and high pressure on inactivation of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Marwen Moussa; Jean-Marie Perrier-Cornet; Patrick Gervais
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Damage in Escherichia coli cells treated with a combination of high hydrostatic pressure and subzero temperature.

Authors:  Marwen Moussa; Jean-Marie Perrier-Cornet; Patrick Gervais
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Pressure inactivation of Bacillus endospores.

Authors:  Dirk Margosch; Michael G Gänzle; Matthias A Ehrmann; Rudi F Vogel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  The Copy Number of the spoVA 2mob Operon Determines Pressure Resistance of Bacillus Endospores.

Authors:  Zhen Li; Felix Schottroff; David J Simpson; Michael G Gänzle
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Relationship between sublethal injury and microbial inactivation by the combination of high hydrostatic pressure and citral or tert-butyl hydroquinone.

Authors:  Maria Somolinos; Diego García; Rafael Pagán; Bernard Mackey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  In situ determination of the intracellular pH of Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus plantarum during pressure treatment.

Authors:  Adriana Molina-Gutierrez; Volker Stippl; Antonio Delgado; Michael G Gänzle; Rudi F Vogel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.