Literature DB >> 10877288

Comparisons of predictive values of binary medical diagnostic tests for paired designs.

W Leisenring1, T Alonzo, M S Pepe.   

Abstract

Positive and negative predictive values of a diagnostic test are key clinically relevant measures of test accuracy. Surprisingly, statistical methods for comparing tests with regard to these parameters have not been available for the most common study design in which each test is applied to each study individual. In this paper, we propose a statistic for comparing the predictive values of two diagnostic tests using this paired study design. The proposed statistic is a score statistic derived from a marginal regression model and bears some relation to McNemar's statistic. As McNemar's statistic can be used to compare sensitivities and specificities of diagnostic tests, parameters that condition on disease status, our statistic can be considered as an analog of McNemar's test for the problem of comparing predictive values, parameters that condition on test outcome. We report on the results of a simulation study designed to examine the properties of this test under a variety of conditions. The method is illustrated with data from a study of methods for diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10877288     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00345.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  93 in total

1.  Use of likelihood ratios for comparisons of binary diagnostic tests: underlying ROC curves.

Authors:  Andriy I Bandos; Howard E Rockette; David Gur
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Maximum likelihood estimation of marginal pairwise associations with multiple source predictors.

Authors:  Liam M O'Brien; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Nicholas J Horton
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  Multiple McNemar tests.

Authors:  Peter H Westfall; James F Troendle; Gene Pennello
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Rubella Surveillance and Diagnostic Testing among a Low-Prevalence Population, New York City, 2012-2013.

Authors:  Beth M Isaac; Jane R Zucker; Francesca R Giancotti; Emily Abernathy; Joseph Icenogle; Jennifer L Rakeman; Jennifer B Rosen
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2017-09-05

5.  Improved detection of clinically relevant wound bacteria using autofluorescence image-guided sampling in diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Kathryn Ottolino-Perry; Emilie Chamma; Kristina M Blackmore; Liis Lindvere-Teene; Danielle Starr; Kim Tapang; Cheryl F Rosen; Bethany Pitcher; Tony Panzarella; Ron Linden; Ralph S DaCosta
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Evaluation of urovysion and cytology for bladder cancer detection: a study of 1835 paired urine samples with clinical and histologic correlation.

Authors:  Haythem Dimashkieh; Daynna J Wolff; T Michael Smith; Patricia M Houser; Paul J Nietert; Jack Yang
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Comparative Accuracy of Developmental Screening Questionnaires.

Authors:  R Christopher Sheldrick; Susan Marakovitz; Daryl Garfinkel; Alice S Carter; Ellen C Perrin
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 16.193

8.  Comparison of linear array and line blot assay for detection of human papillomavirus and diagnosis of cervical precancer and cancer in the atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Patti E Gravitt; Diane Solomon; Cosette M Wheeler; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Maxine S Jochelson; D David Dershaw; Janice S Sung; Alexandra S Heerdt; Cynthia Thornton; Chaya S Moskowitz; Jessica Ferrara; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Kevin M Kelly; Judy Dean; W Scott Comulada; Sung-Jae Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.