Literature DB >> 10876236

Rational design of faster associating and tighter binding protein complexes.

T Selzer1, S Albeck, G Schreiber.   

Abstract

A protein design strategy was developed to specifically enhance the rate of association (k(on)) between a pair of proteins without affecting the rate of dissociation (k(off)). The method is based on increasing the electrostatic attraction between the proteins by incorporating charged residues in the vicinity of the binding interface. The contribution of mutations towards the rate of association was calculated using a newly developed computer algorithm, which predicted accurately the rate of association of mutant protein complexes relative to the wild type. Using this design strategy, the rate of association and the affinity between TEM1 beta-lactamase and its protein inhibitor BLIP was enhanced 250-fold, while the dissociation rate constant was unchanged. The results emphasize that long range electrostatic forces specifically alter k(on), but do not effect k(off). The design strategy presented here is applicable for increasing rates of association and affinities of protein complexes in general.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10876236     DOI: 10.1038/76744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Struct Biol        ISSN: 1072-8368


  108 in total

1.  Electrostatics in protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Alexander Heifetz; Ephraim Katchalski-Katzir; Miriam Eisenstein
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions.

Authors:  David M Lorber; Maria K Udo; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Electrostatically optimized Ras-binding Ral guanine dissociation stimulator mutants increase the rate of association by stabilizing the encounter complex.

Authors:  C Kiel; T Selzer; Y Shaul; G Schreiber; C Herrmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Deepa Rajamani; Spencer Thiel; Sandor Vajda; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  How optimal are the binding energetics of barnase and barstar?

Authors:  Ting Wang; Sanja Tomic; Razif R Gabdoulline; Rebecca C Wade
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  The diabetogenic mouse MHC class II molecule I-Ag7 is endowed with a switch that modulates TCR affinity.

Authors:  Kenji Yoshida; Adam L Corper; Rana Herro; Bana Jabri; Ian A Wilson; Luc Teyton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using electrostatic desolvation profiles.

Authors:  Sébastien Fiorucci; Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Functional mapping of the anti-idiotypic antibody anti-TS1 scFv using site-directed mutagenesis and kinetic analysis.

Authors:  Ann Erlandsson; Patrik Holm; Rozbeh Jafari; Torgny Stigbrand; Birgitta E Sundström
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

9.  Structural determinants of affinity enhancement between GoLoco motifs and G-protein alpha subunit mutants.

Authors:  Dustin E Bosch; Adam J Kimple; Deanne W Sammond; Robin E Muller; Michael J Miley; Mischa Machius; Brian Kuhlman; Francis S Willard; David P Siderovski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Structural basis of efficient electron transport between photosynthetic membrane proteins and plastocyanin in spinach revealed using nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Takumi Ueda; Naoko Nomoto; Masamichi Koga; Hiroki Ogasa; Yuuta Ogawa; Masahiko Matsumoto; Pavlos Stampoulis; Koji Sode; Hiroaki Terasawa; Ichio Shimada
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 11.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.