OBJECTIVES: Multiple (> 1) revisions of lower extremity vein grafts may be required to maintain patency. Characteristics of recurrent lower extremity vein graft lesions and the patency achieved after multiple revisions have not been emphasized in reports on infrainguinal vein graft stenosis. This study was performed to determine (1) the patency of multiply revised lower extremity vein grafts and (2) the timing, location, and angiographic and duplex features of the recurrent lesions. METHODS: Lower extremity vein grafts that were followed in a duplex surveillance protocol and required revisions from January 1990 through December 1998 were identified. All revisions were preceded by angiography. In multiply revised lower extremity vein grafts, the immediate preoperative angiogram and duplex examination findings, as well as the angiogram made before the previous revision and the duplex study done after the previous revision, were reviewed to characterize recurrent lesions at the time of previous and current graft revision. The patencies of grafts undergoing single and multiple revisions were compared. RESULTS: A total of 233 lower extremity vein graft revisions were performed; of these, 50 (21%) were repeat revisions. Of grafts requiring more than one revision, 98% were normal on duplex examination after the initial revision. Five-year assisted primary patency of multiply revised grafts (91%) was not different from that of grafts with a single revision (89%; P not significant). Of 60 lesions repaired in the 50 repeat revisions, 29 (48%) were at the previously revised site, and 31 (52%) were at new sites. The time between revisions was less if the same site was revised (11 +/- 2 months) than if a different site required revision (20 +/- 4 months; P <.05). Arteriographic evidence of a minor (< 50% diameter) lesion was present at the time of the initial revision in 23% of cases in which revision of a second site was subsequently required. CONCLUSION: In our experience, 21% of lower extremity vein grafts requiring initial revision ultimately require additional revisions. Multiply revised lower extremity vein grafts have excellent long-term patency. Lesions occur with equal frequency at the site of prior revision and new sites. Lesions prompting revision at new sites occur significantly later and are infrequently detected on prior imaging studies.
OBJECTIVES: Multiple (> 1) revisions of lower extremity vein grafts may be required to maintain patency. Characteristics of recurrent lower extremity vein graft lesions and the patency achieved after multiple revisions have not been emphasized in reports on infrainguinal vein graft stenosis. This study was performed to determine (1) the patency of multiply revised lower extremity vein grafts and (2) the timing, location, and angiographic and duplex features of the recurrent lesions. METHODS: Lower extremity vein grafts that were followed in a duplex surveillance protocol and required revisions from January 1990 through December 1998 were identified. All revisions were preceded by angiography. In multiply revised lower extremity vein grafts, the immediate preoperative angiogram and duplex examination findings, as well as the angiogram made before the previous revision and the duplex study done after the previous revision, were reviewed to characterize recurrent lesions at the time of previous and current graft revision. The patencies of grafts undergoing single and multiple revisions were compared. RESULTS: A total of 233 lower extremity vein graft revisions were performed; of these, 50 (21%) were repeat revisions. Of grafts requiring more than one revision, 98% were normal on duplex examination after the initial revision. Five-year assisted primary patency of multiply revised grafts (91%) was not different from that of grafts with a single revision (89%; P not significant). Of 60 lesions repaired in the 50 repeat revisions, 29 (48%) were at the previously revised site, and 31 (52%) were at new sites. The time between revisions was less if the same site was revised (11 +/- 2 months) than if a different site required revision (20 +/- 4 months; P <.05). Arteriographic evidence of a minor (< 50% diameter) lesion was present at the time of the initial revision in 23% of cases in which revision of a second site was subsequently required. CONCLUSION: In our experience, 21% of lower extremity vein grafts requiring initial revision ultimately require additional revisions. Multiply revised lower extremity vein grafts have excellent long-term patency. Lesions occur with equal frequency at the site of prior revision and new sites. Lesions prompting revision at new sites occur significantly later and are infrequently detected on prior imaging studies.
Authors: Richard D Kenagy; Shinsuke Kikuchi; Lihua Chen; Errol S Wijelath; Andrew B Stergachis; John Stamatoyannopoulos; Gale L Tang; Alexander W Clowes; Michael Sobel Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Richard D Kenagy; Nozomi Fukai; Seung-Kee Min; Florencia Jalikis; Ted R Kohler; Alexander W Clowes Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 4.268