Literature DB >> 10875855

Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial. The European Orgalutran Study Group.

G Borm, B Mannaerts.   

Abstract

A multicentre, open-label, randomized study of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran((R))/Antagon((TM))) was performed in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH: Puregon((R))). The study was designed as a non-inferiority study using a long protocol of buserelin (intranasal) and rFSH as a reference treatment. A total of 730 subjects was randomized in a treatment ratio of 2:1 (ganirelix:buserelin) using an interactive voice response system which stratified for age, type of infertility and planned fertilization procedure [IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)]. The median duration of GnRH analogue treatment was 5 days in the ganirelix group and 26 days in the buserelin group, whereas the median total rFSH dose was 1500 IU and 1800 IU respectively. In addition, in the ganirelix group the mean duration of stimulation was 1 day shorter. During ganirelix treatment the incidence of LH rises (LH >/=10 IU/l) was 2.8% versus 1.3% during rFSH stimulation in the buserelin group. On the day of triggering ovulation by human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), the mean number of follicles >/=11 mm diameter was 10.7 and 11.8, and the median serum oestradiol concentrations were 1190 pg/ml and 1700 pg/ml in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. The mean number of oocytes per retrieval was 9.1 and 10.4 respectively, whereas the mean number of good quality embryos was 3.3 and 3.5 respectively. The fertilization rate was equal in both groups (62.1%), and the same mean number of embryos (2.2) was replaced. The mean implantation rates were 15.7% and 21.8%, and the ongoing pregnancy rates per attempt were 20.3% and 25.7% in the ganirelix and buserelin groups respectively. Evaluation of all safety data indicated that the ganirelix regimen was safe and well tolerated. The overall incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was 2.4% in the ganirelix group and 5.9% in the reference group. The results of this study support a safe, short and convenient treatment regimen of ganirelix, resulting in a good clinical outcome for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF or ICSI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10875855     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.7.1490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  49 in total

1.  The added value of embryo cryopreservation to cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates per IVF treatment: is cryopreservation worth the effort?

Authors:  D de Jong; M J C Eijkemans; N G M Beckers; R V Pruijsten; B C J M Fauser; N S Macklon
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Optimized hormonal stimulation is critical for production of viable embryos and establishment of subsequent implantation.

Authors:  Tao Tao; Alfred Robichaud; Sylvie Nadeau; Rejean Savoie; Bernard Gallant; Rodney J Ouellette
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Association of inhibin B serum levels with parameters of follicular response in a randomized controlled trial comparing gnRH agonist versus antagonist protocols for ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Barbara Sonntag; Ludwig Kiesel; Eberhard Nieschlag; Hermann M Behre
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  The role of aromatase inhibitors in ameliorating deleterious effects of ovarian stimulation on outcome of infertility treatment.

Authors:  Mohamed F M Mitwally; Robert F Casper; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Outcome of frozen-thawed blastocysts derived from gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist or antagonist cycles.

Authors:  Robert Medved; Irma Virant-Klun; Helena Meden-Vrtovec; Tomaz Tomazevic
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  The effects of GnRH antagonist on the endometrium of normally menstruating women.

Authors:  Porntip Sirayapiwat; Somchai Suwajanakorn; Surang Triratanachat; Somchai Niruthisard
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Effect of GnRHa ovulation trigger dose on follicular fluid characteristics and granulosa cell gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Thi Ngoc Lan Vuong; M T Ho; T Q Ha; M Brehm Jensen; C Yding Andersen; P Humaidan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  A novel "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improves outcomes in poor responders.

Authors:  Hakan Cakmak; Nam D Tran; A Musa Zamah; Marcelle I Cedars; Mitchell P Rosen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Molecular characterization, modeling, in silico analysis of equine pituitary gonadotropin alpha subunit and docking interaction studies with ganirelix.

Authors:  Anuradha Bhardwaj; Varij Nayan; Parvati Sharma; Sanjay Kumar; Yash Pal; Jitender Singh
Journal:  In Silico Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 10.  A benefit-risk assessment of medical treatment for uterine leiomyomas.

Authors:  Vincenzo De Leo; Giuseppe Morgante; Antonio La Marca; Maria Concetta Musacchio; Massimo Sorace; Chiara Cavicchioli; Felice Petraglia
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.