Literature DB >> 10875779

Behavioral responses of broilers to different gaseous atmospheres.

M A Gerritzen1, E Lambooij, S J Hillebrand, J A Lankhaar, C Pieterse.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the differences in behavioral response of broilers when they come into contact for the first time with gas mixtures that can be used for stunning. The six test groups were divided into four experimental groups that were exposed to gas mixtures used for stunning and two control groups that were exposed to atmospheric air. The different gas mixtures and their concentrations were a) air, no flow (control-); b) circulating air, flowing (control+); c) >90% Ar in air; d) 60% CO2 in air; e) 40% CO2 and 30% O2 in air; and f) 70% Ar and 30% CO2 in air. The behavior of the broilers before entering the gas tunnel, the number of birds that moved into the gas mixture, and the behavior in the gas mixture were recorded on video and analyzed afterward. No differences among the groups were observed in the number of broilers that walked into the gas tunnel or in the number of birds that tried to return to the cage. Exposure of broilers to the 70% Ar and 30% CO2 mixture resulted in the fastest loss of posture. The number of broilers exhibiting headshaking and gasping was least in the >90% Ar in air mixture. Convulsions were rarely seen in the 40% CO2 and 30% O2 mixture; the other gas mixtures resulted in severe convulsions. The experiment did not indicate that broilers could detect or avoid increased CO2 or decreased O2 levels when they come into contact with such atmospheres for the first time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10875779     DOI: 10.1093/ps/79.6.928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  6 in total

1.  Investigation Into the Humaneness of Slaughter Methods for Guinea Pigs (Cavia porcelus) in the Andean Region.

Authors:  Georgina Limon; Eloy A Gonzales-Gustavson; Troy J Gibson
Journal:  J Appl Anim Welf Sci       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 1.440

2.  Welfare assessment of novel on-farm killing methods for poultry.

Authors:  Jessica E Martin; Victoria Sandilands; Julian Sparrey; Laurence Baker; Laura M Dixon; Dorothy E F McKeegan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Humanely Ending the Life of Animals: Research Priorities to Identify Alternatives to Carbon Dioxide.

Authors:  Aline R Steiner; Shannon Axiak Flammer; Ngaio J Beausoleil; Charlotte Berg; Regula Bettschart-Wolfensberger; Rebeca García Pinillos; Huw D W Golledge; Michael Marahrens; Robert Meyer; Tobias Schnitzer; Michael J Toscano; Patricia V Turner; Daniel M Weary; Thomas C Gent
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Evaluation of Two Compressed Air Foam Systems for Culling Caged Layer Hens.

Authors:  Eric R Benson; Jaclyn A Weiher; Robert L Alphin; Morgan Farnell; Daniel P Hougentogler
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Defining characteristics of immersion carbon dioxide gas for successful euthanasia of neonatal and young broilers.

Authors:  B I Baker; S Torrey; T M Widowski; P V Turner; T D Knezacek; J Nicholds; T G Crowe; K Schwean-Lardner
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Evaluation of Euthanasia Methods on Behavioral and Physiological Responses of Newly Hatched Male Layer Chicks.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Dan Zhao; Allison C Milby; Gregory S Archer; E David Peebles; Shailesh Gurung; Morgan B Farnell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.