Literature DB >> 10875674

Measuring injury risk factors: question reliability in a statewide sample.

J Koziol-McLain1, D Brand, D Morgan, M Leff, S R Lowenstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently (1996-98), Colorado added 15 questions pertaining to injury related risks and behaviors to the behavioral risk factor surveillance system (BRFSS). Questions addressed bicycle helmet use, traffic crashes, exposure to violence, suicidal behavior, and gun storage.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the test-retest reliability of these injury related questions.
METHODS: Of 330 BRFSS participants, 229 (69%) were called a second time and reasked nine selected injury questions. Retests were completed 7-28 days after the original interview.
RESULTS: Test-retest agreement was very high (kappa >0.80) for bicycle helmet use, domestic police visits, and gun ownership. All other injury risk questions had substantial agreement (kappa >0.60).
CONCLUSIONS: The injury related questions added to the Colorado BRFSS have high test-retest reliability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10875674      PMCID: PMC1730612          DOI: 10.1136/ip.6.2.148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  7 in total

1.  Reliability of the behavioral risk factor survey in a triethnic population.

Authors:  S Shea; A D Stein; R Lantigua; C E Basch
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Should an expected number of cases be an integer?

Authors:  U Strömberg
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes.

Authors:  A R Feinstein; D V Cicchetti
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic.

Authors:  M Maclure; W C Willett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Reproducibility of responses to telephone interviews: demographic predictors of discordance in risk factor status.

Authors:  A D Stein; J M Courval; R I Lederman; S Shea
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System questionnaire: its reliability in a statewide sample.

Authors:  A D Stein; R I Lederman; S Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of urban and rural non-fatal injury: the results of a statewide survey.

Authors:  M Leff; L Stallones; T J Keefe; R Rosenblatt; M Reeds
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  A comparison of information on motor vehicle crashes as reported by written or telephone interviews.

Authors:  A Alonso; S Laguna; M Seguí-Gómez
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.399

3.  The New Zealand Blood Donors' Health Study: baseline findings of a large prospective cohort study of injury.

Authors:  S N Ameratunga; R N Norton; G Whitlock; S Macmahon; C Coggan; R T Jackson; J D Langley; V Parag; D Smith; D G Woodfield
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.399

4.  Reliability of a patient survey assessing cost-related changes in health care use among high deductible health plan enrollees.

Authors:  Robert B Penfold; Jeffrey T Kullgren; Irina Miroshnik; Alison A Galbraith; Virginia L Hinrichsen; Tracy A Lieu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Exposure to a Motor Vehicle Collision and the Risk of Future Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Paul S Nolet; Peter C Emary; Vicki L Kristman; Kent Murnaghan; Maurice P Zeegers; Michael D Freeman
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.298

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.