Literature DB >> 10875632

Effects of a unique application of electrical stimulation on tenderness, color, and quality attributes of the beef longissimus muscle.

D L Roeber1, R C Cannell, K E Belk, J D Tatum, G C Smith.   

Abstract

This study evaluated effects of four uniquely applied beef carcass electrical stimulation (ES) treatments on USDA grade factors, muscle color, subprimal purge loss, cooked steak weight loss, and cooked steak tenderness. One side of each (n = 284) beef carcass was subjected to ES using one of four treatments (medium voltage for medium duration, MVMD; medium voltage for long duration, MVLD; high voltage for medium duration, HVMD; or high voltage for long duration, HVLD) and was compared to its corresponding non-ES control side. Electrical stimulation of beef sides was applied focusing on middle meats while preventing severe contraction of the round and chuck. From matched (ES and control) sides of 120 carcasses (10 each of Select, low Choice, and upper two-thirds of Choice in each of the four ES treatments), longissimus steaks (2.5 cm thick) were cooked and used for Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBS) analysis. Mean marbling scores (n = 284) for stimulated sides did not differ (P = .923) from those for control sides within ES treatment classes. Mean values for CIE L*, a*, and b* of lean color (n = 284) were higher (P < .05) for MVMD, MVLD, HVMD, and HVLD treated sides than for the respective control sides. When WBS values for steaks were adjusted to an equal visual degree of doneness, WBS values (n = 120) were lower (P < .05) for ES treated sides than for control sides for all four types of ES application treatments. Treatment responses were not influenced by USDA Quality Grade group. For those carcasses for which the control sides had WBS values greater than 4.5 kg, matching sides treated with MVMD, MVLD, HVMD, or HVLD had WBS values less than 4.5 kg 50, 88, 60, and 75% of the time, respectively. Mean cooked steak weight loss (n = 120), adjusted to an equal visual degree of doneness, and mean purge loss (n = 24) did not differ with ES treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10875632     DOI: 10.2527/2000.7861504x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  Genome-wide association study identifies loci and candidate genes for meat quality traits in Simmental beef cattle.

Authors:  Jiangwei Xia; Xin Qi; Yang Wu; Bo Zhu; Lingyang Xu; Lupei Zhang; Xue Gao; Yan Chen; Junya Li; Huijiang Gao
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Genome-wide association analysis for quantitative trait loci influencing Warner-Bratzler shear force in five taurine cattle breeds.

Authors:  M C McClure; H R Ramey; M M Rolf; S D McKay; J E Decker; R H Chapple; J W Kim; T M Taxis; R L Weaber; R D Schnabel; J F Taylor
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Efficacy of carcass electrical stimulation in meat quality enhancement: a review.

Authors:  Kazeem Dauda Adeyemi; Awis Qurni Sazili
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Low-Voltage Electrical Stimulation of Beef Carcasses Slows Carcass Chilling Rate and Improves Steak Color.

Authors:  Christina Bakker; Keith Underwood; Judson Kyle Grubbs; Amanda Blair
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-05-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.