Literature DB >> 10874547

The use of electric bed heaters and the risk of clinically recognized spontaneous abortion.

G M Lee1, R R Neutra, L Hristova, M Yost, R A Hiatt.   

Abstract

We conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate the relation of spontaneous abortion and electric bed heater use during the first trimester of pregnancy. Compared with non-users, rates of spontaneous abortion were lower for women who used electric bed heaters. The adjusted odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the two major devices used, electric blankets (N = 524) and waterbeds (N = 796), were, respectively, 0.8 (95% CI = 0.5-1.1) and 0.9 (95% CI = 0.7-1.2). An increase of risk with increasing intensity (setting-duration combination) of use was not observed. Users of electric blankets at low settings for most of the night (N = 171) had lower risks of spontaneous abortion than non-users (adjusted odds ratio = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.3-1.0). Twenty women who used electric blankets at a high setting for 1 hour or less had an adjusted odds ratio of 3.0 (95% CI = 1.1-8.3), but we found no spontaneous abortions among the few women (N = 13) who used a high setting for 2 or more hours. We found that exposure rankings of the magnetic field time-weighted average and a rate of change metric did not correspond monotonically to the pattern of spontaneous abortion risks and that electric blankets contribute less to overnight time-weighted average magnetic fields than has been thought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10874547     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200007000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  8 in total

1.  Exposure to electromagnetic fields during pregnancy.

Authors:  Gideon Koren
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Electric Blanket Use and Risk of Thyroid Cancer in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Cohort.

Authors:  Ikuko Kato; Alicia Young; Jingmin Liu; Judith Abrams; Cathryn Bock; Michael Simon
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2015-05-21

Review 3.  Exposure to Power-Frequency Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Infertility and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Update on the Human Evidence and Recommendations for Future Study Designs.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Andrew D Maynard; Richard L Neitzel; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.393

4.  Temporal variability of daily personal magnetic field exposure metrics in pregnant women.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Kelly R Evenson; David A Savitz; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 5.  Review of the epidemiologic literature on EMF and Health.

Authors:  I C Ahlbom; E Cardis; A Green; M Linet; D Savitz; A Swerdlow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Residential exposure to 50 Hz magnetic fields and the association with miscarriage risk: a 2-year prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Qiang Wang; Zhaojin Cao; Yingli Qu; Xiaowu Peng; Shu Guo; Li Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Extremely low frequency magnetic fields induce spermatogenic germ cell apoptosis: possible mechanism.

Authors:  Sang-Kon Lee; Sungman Park; Yoon-Myoung Gimm; Yoon-Won Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Effect of electromagnetic field on abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Masumeh Ghazanfarpour; Zahra Atarodi Kashani; Reza Pakzad; Fatemeh Abdi; Fatemeh Alsadat Rahnemaei; Pouran Akhavan Akbari; Nasibeh Roozbeh
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2021-11-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.