Literature DB >> 10874511

Neuroexcitatory effects of morphine and hydromorphone: evidence implicating the 3-glucuronide metabolites.

M T Smith1.   

Abstract

1. Morphine is recommended by the World Health Organization as the drug of choice for the management of moderate to severe cancer pain. 2. Education of health professionals in the past decade has resulted in a large increase in the prescribing of opioids, such as morphine, and in the magnitude of the doses administered, resulting in an improvement in the quality of pain relief available for many cancer patients. 3. However, the reported incidence of neuroexcitatory side effects (allodynia, myoclonus, seizures) in patients administered large doses of systemic morphine or its structural analogue, hydromorphone (HMOR), has also increased. 4. Clinically, increasing the magnitude of the morphine or HMOR dose administered to patients already exhibiting neuroexcitatory opioid related side effects, results in an exacerbation rather than an attenuation of the excitatory behaviours. 5. In contrast, cessation of the opioid or rotation to a structurally dissimilar opioid (e.g. from morphine/HMOR to methadone or fentanyl), usually results in a restoration of analgesia and resolution of the neuroexcitatory opioid side effects over a period of hours to days. 6. To explain the clinical success of 'opioid rotation', it is essential to understand the in vivo metabolic fate of morphine and HMOR. 7. Following systemic administration, morphine and HMOR are metabolized primarily to the corresponding 3-glucuronide metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and hydromorphone-3-glucuronide (H3G), which are not only devoid of analgesic activity but evoke a range of dose-dependent excitatory behaviours, including allodynia, myoclonus and seizures, following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration to rats. 8. Several studies have shown that, following chronic oral or subcutaneous morphine administration to patients with cancer pain, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of M3G exceed those of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (analgesically active morphine metabolite) by approximately two- and five-fold, respectively. 9. These findings suggest that when the M3G concentration (or H3G by analogy) in the CSF exceeds the neuroexcitatory threshold, excitatory behaviours will be evoked in patients. 10. Thus, rotation of the opioid from morphine/HMOR to a structurally dissimilar opioid, such as methadone or fentanyl, will allow clearance of M3G/H3G from the patient central nervous system over hours to days, thereby producing a time-dependent resolution of the neuroexcitatory behaviours while maintaining analgesia with methadone or fentanyl.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10874511     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2000.03290.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol        ISSN: 0305-1870            Impact factor:   2.557


  52 in total

Review 1.  Implications of opioid analgesia for medically complicated patients.

Authors:  Howard Smith; Patricia Bruckenthal
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Principles of opioid use in chronic noncancer pain.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gardner-Nix
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  [Do opioids induce hyperalgesia?].

Authors:  C Zöllner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  The assessment and management of agitation and delirium in the general hospital.

Authors:  Theodore A Stern; Christopher M Celano; Anne F Gross; Jeff C Huffman; Oliver Freudenreich; Nicholas Kontos; Shamim H Nejad; Jennifer Repper-Delisi; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010

5.  ABCC3 and OCT1 genotypes influence pharmacokinetics of morphine in children.

Authors:  Raja Venkatasubramanian; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Jing Niu; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Vidya Chidambaran; Alexander A Vinks; Senthilkumar Sadhasivam
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 6.  Advances in opioid pharmacology.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Gourlay
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Methadone for treatment of cancer pain.

Authors:  John Bryson; Anoo Tamber; Dori Seccareccia; Camilla Zimmermann
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Role of active metabolites in the use of opioids.

Authors:  Janet K Coller; Lona L Christrup; Andrew A Somogyi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Population pharmacokinetics of heroin and its major metabolites.

Authors:  Elisabeth J Rook; Alwin D R Huitema; Wim van den Brink; Jan M van Ree; Jos H Beijnen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Pediatric Oncology: Managing Pain at the End of Life.

Authors:  Jennifer M Snaman; Justin N Baker; Jennifer H Ehrentraut; Doralina L Anghelescu
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.