Literature DB >> 10874158

Potential health effects of drinking water disinfection by-products using quantitative structure toxicity relationship.

C J Moudgal1, J C Lipscomb, R M Bruce.   

Abstract

Disinfection by-products (DBPs) are produced as a result of disinfecting water using various treatment methods. Over the years, chlorine has remained the most popular disinfecting agent due to its ability to kill pathogens. However, in 1974, it was discovered that the superchlorination of drinking water resulted in the production of chloroform and other trihalomethanes. Since then hundreds of additional DBPs have been identified, including haloacetic acids and haloacetonitriles with very little or no toxicological data available, thus necessitating the use of additional methods for hazard estimation. Quantitative Structure Toxicity Relationship (QSTR) is one such method and utilizes a computer-based technology to predict the toxicity of a chemical solely from its molecular attributes. The current research was conducted utilizing the TOPKAT/QSTR software package which is comprised of robust, cross-validated QSTR models for assessing mutagenicity, rodent carcinogenicity (female/male; rat/mouse), developmental toxicity, skin sensitization, lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL), fathead minnow LC(50), rat oral LD(50) and Daphia magna EC(50). A total of 252 DBPs were analyzed for the likelihood that they would produce tumors and developmental effects using the carcinogenicity and developmental toxicity submodels of TOPKAT. The model predictions were evaluated to identify generalizations between the functional groups (e.g. alcohols, acids, etc.) and specific toxic endpoints. Developmental toxicity was identified as an endpoint common to the majority of aliphatic mono- and dicarboxylic acids, aliphatic halogenated and non-halogenated ketones, and aliphatic haloacetonitriles. In the case of the carcinogenicity submodels, most aliphatic aldehydes were identified as carcinogens only in the female mouse submodel. The majority of the aliphatic and aromatic dicarboxylic acids were identified as carcinogens in the female rat submodel. All other functional groups examined were largely predicted as non-carcinogens in all the cancer submodels (i.e. male/female rats and mice). The QSTR results should aid in the prioritization for evaluation of toxic endpoints in the absence of in vivo bioassays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10874158     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00188-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicology        ISSN: 0300-483X            Impact factor:   4.221


  7 in total

1.  Total trihalomethanes in public drinking water supply and birth outcomes: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sanjaya Kumar; Steve Forand; Gwen Babcock; Wayne Richter; Thomas Hart; Syni-An Hwang
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-05

Review 2.  Joint toxicity of alkoxyethanol mixtures: contribution of in silico applications.

Authors:  H R Pohl; P Ruiz; F Scinicariello; M M Mumtaz
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Risk assessment of trihalomethanes from tap water in Fortaleza, Brazil.

Authors:  Rommel B Viana; Rivelino M Cavalcante; Fuad M G Braga; Anderson B Viana; José C de Araujo; Ronaldo F Nascimento; André S Pimentel
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Genotoxicity of a Low-Dose Nitrosamine Mixture as Drinking Water Disinfection Byproducts in NIH3T3 Cells.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Wang; Ming Qin; Lei Dong; Jia-Ying Lv; Xia Wang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 5.  Development of a research strategy for integrated technology-based toxicological and chemical evaluation of complex mixtures of drinking water disinfection byproducts.

Authors:  Jane Ellen Simmons; Susan D Richardson; Thomas F Speth; Richard J Miltner; Glenn Rice; Kathleen M Schenck; E Sidney Hunter; Linda K Teuschler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Prediction of acute mammalian toxicity using QSAR methods: a case study of sulfur mustard and its breakdown products.

Authors:  Patricia Ruiz; Gino Begluitti; Terry Tincher; John Wheeler; Moiz Mumtaz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 7.  Silver as a disinfectant.

Authors:  Nadia Silvestry-Rodriguez; Enue E Sicairos-Ruelas; Charles P Gerba; Kelly R Bright
Journal:  Rev Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 7.563

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.