Literature DB >> 10873351

Colorectal cancer follow-up: perspectives for future studies.

R A Audisio1, C Robertson.   

Abstract

This paper reviews some of the issues involved in the planning and execution of studies to assess the effect of different follow-up strategies for colorectal cancer patients. Mathematical models and many previous studies have failed to indicate strong support for the hypothesis that extensive follow-up leads to an increase in survival rates. In order to assess the best follow-up strategies, at present, within the different Dukes' stages, extremely large trials are required and none of the previous studies have satisfied this criterion, though recently planned studies will, if recruitment targets are met. The large number of patients required, the length of time the study must run, existing accepted follow-up practices in different countries, and the difficulty of managing patients on different follow-up strategies within the same centre all pose problems for the design of a randomized trial. These are not insurmountable, but do contribute to a possible downfall of a large multicentre randomized trial of follow-up strategies. Although such a trial will require considerable international cooperation it will have enormous benefits and implications if it is managed and completed successfully. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10873351     DOI: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  9 in total

1.  Surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Adena Scheer; Rebecca Ann C Auer
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-11

2.  Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for patients with colorectal cancer in Nova Scotia.

Authors:  Robin Urquhart; Amy Folkes; Geoffrey Porter; Cynthia Kendell; Martha Cox; Ron Dewar; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 3.  Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mark Jeffery; Brigid E Hickey; Phil N Hider; Adrienne M See
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-24

4.  Post-treatment surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer with surgically treated liver metastases.

Authors:  Omar Hyder; Rebecca M Dodson; Skye C Mayo; Eric B Schneider; Matthew J Weiss; Joseph M Herman; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer surveillance: what's new and what's next.

Authors:  Johnie Rose; Knut Magne Augestad; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Trends and patterns of utilization in post-treatment surveillance imaging among patients treated for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Omar Hyder; Rebecca M Dodson; Matthew Weiss; David P Cosgrove; Joseph M Herman; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Ihab R Kamel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mark Jeffery; Brigid E Hickey; Phillip N Hider
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-04

8.  Patterns of cancer centre follow-up care for survivors of breast, colorectal, gynecologic, and prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Urquhart; L Lethbridge; G A Porter
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 9.  Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline.

Authors:  Alvaro Figueredo; R Bryan Rumble; Jean Maroun; Craig C Earle; Bernard Cummings; Robin McLeod; Lisa Zuraw; Caroline Zwaal
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.