OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid and serum after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption and intra-arterial administration compared with intravenous or simple intra-arterial infusion in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma. METHODS: Serum and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid were sampled after methotrexate administration in 12 patients. Blood-brain barrier disruption was induced on 2 sequential days by mannitol (25%) infusion delivered to the vertebral or internal carotid artery territories followed by intra-arterial methotrexate (dose, 1.4 g/m2; 47 treatments). Sixteen treatments were given without barrier disruption by intravenous (3.5 g/m2; nine treatments) or intra-arterial (2.8 g/m2; seven treatments) infusion. RESULTS: Ventricular cerebrospinal fluid-methotrexate peak levels after blood-brain barrier disruption of the vertebral and the internal carotid arteries territories were 19.3 +/- 2.9 and 8.5 +/- 0.7 micromol/L (P < .001), and the area under the curve from time 0 to infinity was 178.0 +/- 21.3 and 110.0 +/- 12.4 [micromol/L x h, respectively (P < .01). No significant differences were observed in serum levels. After intra-arterial infusion was performed without disruption, the serum peak level was higher than that achieved by intravenous treatment (518.2 +/- 67.7 versus 180.6 +/- 31.8 micromol/L; P < .001). No differences were observed in cerebrospinal fluid concentrations, which dropped below 1 micromol/L at 6 hours. The cerebrospinal fluid/serum ratio [AUC(%)] of methotrexate after blood-brain barrier disruption was three to four times greater than that by systemic administration. CONCLUSION: Enhanced methotrexate delivery to the central nervous system can be attained by intra-arterial administration combined with osmotic disruption of the blood-brain barrier compared with simple intra-arterial or intravenous administration.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid and serum after osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption and intra-arterial administration compared with intravenous or simple intra-arterial infusion in patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma. METHODS: Serum and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid were sampled after methotrexate administration in 12 patients. Blood-brain barrier disruption was induced on 2 sequential days by mannitol (25%) infusion delivered to the vertebral or internal carotid artery territories followed by intra-arterial methotrexate (dose, 1.4 g/m2; 47 treatments). Sixteen treatments were given without barrier disruption by intravenous (3.5 g/m2; nine treatments) or intra-arterial (2.8 g/m2; seven treatments) infusion. RESULTS: Ventricular cerebrospinal fluid-methotrexate peak levels after blood-brain barrier disruption of the vertebral and the internal carotid arteries territories were 19.3 +/- 2.9 and 8.5 +/- 0.7 micromol/L (P < .001), and the area under the curve from time 0 to infinity was 178.0 +/- 21.3 and 110.0 +/- 12.4 [micromol/L x h, respectively (P < .01). No significant differences were observed in serum levels. After intra-arterial infusion was performed without disruption, the serum peak level was higher than that achieved by intravenous treatment (518.2 +/- 67.7 versus 180.6 +/- 31.8 micromol/L; P < .001). No differences were observed in cerebrospinal fluid concentrations, which dropped below 1 micromol/L at 6 hours. The cerebrospinal fluid/serum ratio [AUC(%)] of methotrexate after blood-brain barrier disruption was three to four times greater than that by systemic administration. CONCLUSION: Enhanced methotrexate delivery to the central nervous system can be attained by intra-arterial administration combined with osmotic disruption of the blood-brain barrier compared with simple intra-arterial or intravenous administration.
Authors: Randy S D'Amico; Deepak Khatri; Noah Reichman; Nitesh V Patel; Tamika Wong; Sherese R Fralin; Mona Li; Jason A Ellis; Rafael Ortiz; David J Langer; John A Boockvar Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Aysegul Ergin; Mei Wang; Jane Y Zhang; Jeffrey N Bruce; Robert L Fine; Irving J Bigio; Shailendra Joshi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2011-10-01 Impact factor: 4.130