Literature DB >> 10872016

Ischemic stroke risk with oral contraceptives: A meta-analysis.

L A Gillum1, S K Mamidipudi, S C Johnston.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The relationship between ischemic stroke and oral contraceptive (OC) use has been studied for 40 years, but disagreement about an association persists.
OBJECTIVE: To review available literature to determine whether OC use is associated with increased stroke risk. DATA SOURCES: Studies published from January 1960 through November 1999 were identified from electronic databases (MEDLINE, BIOSIS, and Dissertation Abstracts Online), Index Medicus, bibliographies of pertinent review articles and pertinent original articles, textbooks, and expert consultation. STUDY SELECTION: From 804 potentially relevant references retrieved, 73 were studies investigating risk of ischemic stroke with OC use. Two reviewers independently applied the following inclusion criteria: more than 10 stroke cases sampled, clear stroke subtype differentiation, concurrent controls included, adequate data included to determine relative risks (RRs) and confidence intervals (CIs), analysis controlled for age, and no later publication of identical data. A third investigator adjudicated disagreements. Sixteen studies met all inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators independently extracted data, with disagreements resolved through discussion. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 16 studies were analyzed using random effects modeling. Current OC use was associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke (RR, 2.75; 95% CI, 2.24-3.38). Smaller estrogen dosages were associated with lower risk (P=.01 for trend), but risk was significantly elevated for all dosages. Studies that did not control for smoking (P=.01) and those using hospital-based controls (P<.001) found higher RRs, but no other patient characteristics or elements of study design were important. The summary RR was 1.93 (95% CI, 1.35-2.74) for low-estrogen preparations in population-based studies that controlled for smoking and hypertension. This translates to an additional 4.1 ischemic strokes per 100,000 nonsmoking, normotensive women using low-estrogen OCs, or 1 additional ischemic stroke per year per 24,000 such women. The RR of stroke due to OC use was not different in women who smoked, had migraines, or had hypertension.
CONCLUSIONS: Summary results indicate that risk of ischemic stroke is increased in current OC users, even with newer low-estrogen preparations. However, the absolute increase in stroke risk is expected to be small since incidence is very low in this population. JAMA. 2000;284:72-78

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10872016     DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.1.72

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  75 in total

1.  The third generation pill controversy ("continued").

Authors:  J O Drife
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-21

Review 2.  [Risk factors in ischemic stroke. Review of evidence in primary prevention].

Authors:  M Weih; J Müller-Nordhorn; N Amberger; F Masuhr; F Lürtzing; J P Dreier; A Hetzel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Véronique L Roger; Alan S Go; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Robert J Adams; Jarett D Berry; Todd M Brown; Mercedes R Carnethon; Shifan Dai; Giovanni de Simone; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Kurt J Greenlund; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; P Michael Ho; Virginia J Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Diane M Makuc; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Mary M McDermott; James B Meigs; Claudia S Moy; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Wayne D Rosamond; Paul D Sorlie; Randall S Stafford; Tanya N Turan; Melanie B Turner; Nathan D Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Revisiting the timing hypothesis: biomarkers that define the therapeutic window of estrogen for stroke.

Authors:  Farida Sohrabji; Amutha Selvamani; Robyn Balden
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 5.  Hormonal contraception and migraine: clinical considerations.

Authors:  Stephanie S Faubion; Petra M Casey; Lynne T Shuster
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-10

Review 6.  Choosing a combined oral contraceptive pill.

Authors:  Mary Stewart; Kirsten Black
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2015-02-02

Review 7.  Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lamberto Manzoli; Corrado De Vito; Carolina Marzuillo; Antonio Boccia; Paolo Villari
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Sex differences in stroke.

Authors:  Roy A M Haast; Deborah R Gustafson; Amanda J Kiliaan
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 9.  Obesity and cardiovascular disease in women.

Authors:  Camila Manrique-Acevedo; Bhavana Chinnakotla; Jaume Padilla; Luis A Martinez-Lemus; David Gozal
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Use of oral contraceptives and postmenopausal hormone replacement: evidence on risk of stroke.

Authors:  Patricia H Davis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.